Re: Permission to upload tcl8.6/tk8.6 8.6.3-1

2014-11-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 12/11/14 14:42, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Hi release team! > > Yeaterday, the Tcl upstream developers have released the third > correcting release of Tcl/Tk 8.6 (version 8.6.3). And I'd like to > upload it and unblock for jessie very much. > > The problem is that the version currently in je

Processed: Re: Permission to upload elmerfem/5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg2-1 to squeeze-proposed-updates (Closes: #687954)

2013-01-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle 698088 Permission to upload elmerfem/5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg2-1 to > stable-proposed-updates (Closes: #687954) Bug #698088 [release.debian.org] Permission to upload elmerfem/5.5.0.svn.4499.dfsg2-1 to squeeze-proposed-updates (Closes: #687954) Changed Bug title

Re: Permission to upload melange v 2012.1-3 (RC bug: #684736)

2012-08-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Thomas. Thomas Goirand (27/08/2012): > I'd like to upload melange 2012.1-3. Mainly, this adds a missing > > Depends: python-melange (= ${source:Version}) > > in the melange binary, which is an RC bug. Please fix that only. > But I have also added some aesthetic changes that aren't related,

Re: Permission to upload armadillo (was Uploading armadillo: soname change)

2012-04-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 09:35:20PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > Armadillo 3 has been released with an soname change. The revers > > > dependencies gdal and dolfin build fine, so a binNMU should be > > > sufficient. May I go ahead and upload the new package to unstable? > > > > A gentle prod?

Re: Permission to upload armadillo (was Uploading armadillo: soname change)

2012-04-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:21:51 -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:42PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Dear Release Team, > > > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > > Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies >

Re: Permission to upload armadillo (was Uploading armadillo: soname change)

2012-04-17 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 08:54:42PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:47:13PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Thanks for the pointer. I have ensured that the reverse dependencies > > build fine. > > > > Now, I am ready to go ahead and upload it and req

Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates

2011-01-25 Thread Pierre-Louis Bonicoli
On 24/01/2011 22:54, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:59:18 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: >> >>> Hi ! >>> >>> I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip. >>> >>> A user of bip reported a bug which can

Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates

2011-01-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 00:14 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: > Duck has uploaded the new package, > thanks to him ! I approved the upload earlier, so it will migrate once it is built and uploaded on all architectures. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.d

Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates

2011-01-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 10:59 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:59:18 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: > > > Hi ! > > > > I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip. > > > > A user of bip reported a bug which can be used to do a remote DOS of > > bip. Bug i

Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates

2011-01-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:59:18 +0100, Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: > Hi ! > > I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip. > > A user of bip reported a bug which can be used to do a remote DOS of > bip. Bug is present in bip/0.8.2-1squeeze2. > > debdiff (bip/0.8.2-1squeeze2 and b

Re: permission to upload bip/0.8.2-1squeeze3 to testing proposed updates

2011-01-22 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Dear release team, On Wednesday 19 January 2011 01:59:18 Pierre-Louis Bonicoli wrote: > I am the upstream and sponsored Debian maintainer of Bip. > > A user of bip reported a bug which can be used to do a remote DOS of > bip. Bug is present in bip/0.8.2-1squeeze2. > > debdiff (bip/0.8.2-1squeeze

Re: Permission to upload oaklisp_1.3.3-3.1 (NMU)

2011-01-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:29 +, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I've thought about it, and I'm okay w/ removing oaklisp from squeeze. > As you say, it has a low popcount. Okay, thanks. In that case, I've added a removal hint. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@

Re: Permission to upload PokerTH 0.7.1-2 for Squeeze

2011-01-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:19 +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote: > On 09/28/2010 08:51 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 15:46 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > >> attached, you find the diff between pokerth 0.7.1-1 (currently in > >> sqeeze/sid) and 0.7.1-2 (which I'd like to upload asap, you

Re: Permission to upload PokerTH 0.7.1-2 for Squeeze

2011-01-04 Thread Evgeni Golov
On 09/28/2010 08:51 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 15:46 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: >> attached, you find the diff between pokerth 0.7.1-1 (currently in >> sqeeze/sid) and 0.7.1-2 (which I'd like to upload asap, you do not want >> to review the changes of 0.8-1 in experimental ;

Re: Permission to upload oaklisp_1.3.3-3.1 (NMU)

2011-01-04 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
I've thought about it, and I'm okay w/ removing oaklisp from squeeze. As you say, it has a low popcount. (The version I recently uploaded does build on amd64, and has no changes to the actual executable generated aside from GCC switches, as can be seen from looking at the src/ subdir. But it does

Re: Permission to upload oaklisp_1.3.3-3.1 (NMU)

2010-12-31 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/31/2010 12:05 AM, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > Thanks! > > (In fact I'm already prepping a fix which includes your patch along > with a AMD64 FTBS fix, albeit a 32-bit one.) > I'm not sure that we will be able to unblock your uploaded version. It bumps compat to 8 and rewrites debian/rul

Re: Permission to upload oaklisp_1.3.3-3.1 (NMU)

2010-12-30 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Thanks! (In fact I'm already prepping a fix which includes your patch along with a AMD64 FTBS fix, albeit a 32-bit one.) --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma

Re: Permission to upload php-image-text_0.6.0beta-3 to SID

2010-12-10 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/12/2010 06:15, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I made very few modifications to the package that are already in git.d.o, the most important being the typo in the description. It's not a RC bug per say, but it would be nice to have such a small fix in, and I don't think it has any potential issue

Re: Permission to upload ttf-lao to add a udeb for Debian Installer

2010-11-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/27/2010 12:35 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > In order to be able to activate support for the Lao language in > D-I, we need to have a udeb of the needed font. > > That udeb has to be provided by the ttf-lao package. > > Would that be OK for the release team? > That's ok. Regards, -- Me

Re: Permission to upload an NMU of ttf-sinhala-lklug

2010-11-18 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk): > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 19:01 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > > > I hereby propose to upload an NMU of this package (patch attached), > > > > Patch *really* attached..:) > > The changelog ver

Re: Permission to upload an NMU of ttf-sinhala-lklug

2010-11-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 19:01 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > > I hereby propose to upload an NMU of this package (patch attached), > > Patch *really* attached..:) The changelog version suggests that this is a maintainer upload. Other than that,

Re: Permission to upload an NMU of ttf-sinhala-lklug

2010-11-14 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > I hereby propose to upload an NMU of this package (patch attached), Patch *really* attached..:) diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 4f3a730..e293b89 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +ttf-sinha

Re: Permission to upload vanessa-logger_0.0.10-1.1 (NMU)

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 16:12:38 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 14/11/2010 14:06, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > The Breaks field seems unnecessary, as you already have Depends on the > > exact version. If you agree please drop the Breaks and go ahead. > > Correct, thanks for spotting. > Simo

Re: Permission to upload vanessa-logger_0.0.10-1.1 (NMU)

2010-11-14 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 14/11/2010 14:06, Julien Cristau ha scritto: > The Breaks field seems unnecessary, as you already have Depends on the > exact version. If you agree please drop the Breaks and go ahead. Correct, thanks for spotting. Simon ACKed the first NMU proposal, so I'm going to upload the revised version

Re: Permission to upload vanessa-logger_0.0.10-1.1 (NMU)

2010-11-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:06:20 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote: > --- vanessa-logger-0.0.10.orig/debian/control > +++ vanessa-logger-0.0.10/debian/control > @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ > Architecture: any > Section: libdevel > Depends: libvanessa-logger0 (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends} > +Breaks: li

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, November 8, 2010 10:24, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 16:50:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for >> > documentation reasons. Currently, we hav

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 16:50:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for > > documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot > > from upstream, namely: 2:2.1

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for > documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot > from upstream, namely: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2. There were only a few > commits upstream between what we m

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Cristau (03/11/2010): > I think we should also revert the patch that regressed backlight on > resolution change (#600405). Ideally, I'd like to get doc updated ASAP, and spend more time on considering patches a tiny while later. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Permission to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2

2010-11-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 21:47:12 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to upload xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.13.0-2, mainly for > documentation reasons. Currently, we have in sid/squeeze a snapshot > from upstream, namely: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2. There were only a few > commits upstream be

Re: Permission to upload remmina_0.8.3-1

2010-10-27 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/26/2010 10:44 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > unblock) for remmina_0.8.3-1. > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.o

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 23.10.2010 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. > >> > >> > >> With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 whic

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Adam! On 23.10.2010 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. >> >> >> With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 which >> removes >> the deprecated libdevkit-power-gobject li

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:38 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Done, 2.32.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable. > > > With all rdeps updated, attached is the debdiff for upower_0.9.5-5 which > removes > the deprecated libdevkit-power-gobject library, closing #595083. > > I've also included a fix for #5

Re: Permission to upload python-papyon 0.4.10 in testing

2010-10-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 20:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:51 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > > ATM python-papyon doesn't work due to changes in MSN servers (bug: > > #600928), papyon 0.4.10 fixes this. > > > > CHANGELOG: > > Fixes: > > * Use the right policy refere

Re: Permission to upload python-papyon 0.4.10 in testing

2010-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 17:51 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > ATM python-papyon doesn't work due to changes in MSN servers (bug: > #600928), papyon 0.4.10 fixes this. > > CHANGELOG: > Fixes: > * Use the right policy reference when requesting security token (fdo #31004) > * Don't send invalid

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-10-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:48 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > >> I sent a debdiff between rc2 and the package I would like to upload. > >> It wasn't rc4->0.1.1 but rc2->0.1.1 (my error writing the email). > > > > Please go ahead. O

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-10-21 Thread Devid Antonio Filoni
The uploaded package is 11 days old but it's still not in testing, any idea? Thanks, Devid On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:48 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: >> I sent a debdiff between rc2 and the package I would like to upload. >> It wasn't

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-19 Thread Michael Biebl
On 19.10.2010 21:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: >> On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: >> >>> 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) >>> >>> Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to >>> libha

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 23:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) > > > > Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to > > libhal-glib being removed (as it is no longer used)

Re: Permission to upload 2 fixes for MLMMJ

2010-10-18 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/17/2010 05:43 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Please give me the green light so that I include these 2 patch in a new > upload to SID, aiming at an unblock for Squeeze. > Looks ok. > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > > -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Re: Permission to upload gnome-power-manager 2.32.0 to unstable (Was: Re: Dropping libdevkit-power-gobject for squeeze.)

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Biebl
On 18.10.2010 23:05, Michael Biebl wrote: > 71 files changed, 3670 insertions(+), 4923 deletions(-) > > Looks a bit scary at first. The high number of deleted lines is due to > libhal-glib being removed (as it is no longer used), and if you don't count > the > very verbose Changelog, the diffst

Re: Permission to upload evolution and evolution-data-server to unstable

2010-10-08 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 26/09/2010 18:10, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On dim., 2010-09-26 at 15:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 21:00:28 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: >> >>> I'd like to upload evolution (2.30.3-2, unstable=2.30.3-1, >>> testing=2.30.2-1) and evolution-data-server (2.30.3-2,

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 12:48 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > I sent a debdiff between rc2 and the package I would like to upload. > It wasn't rc4->0.1.1 but rc2->0.1.1 (my error writing the email). Please go ahead. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.deb

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-09-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:38 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:32:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I've not unblocked the package yet, as it requires a newer > > geany-plugins-common; hopefully that can be resolved soon. > > As geany does not depend on the plugins, and

Re: Permission to upload PokerTH 0.7.1-2 for Squeeze

2010-09-29 Thread Evgeni Golov
On 09/28/2010 08:51 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 15:46 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: >> attached, you find the diff between pokerth 0.7.1-1 (currently in >> sqeeze/sid) and 0.7.1-2 (which I'd like to upload asap, you do not want >> to review the changes of 0.8-1 in experimental ;

Re: Permission to upload PokerTH 0.7.1-2 for Squeeze

2010-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 15:46 +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > attached, you find the diff between pokerth 0.7.1-1 (currently in > sqeeze/sid) and 0.7.1-2 (which I'd like to upload asap, you do not want > to review the changes of 0.8-1 in experimental ;)). [...] > The server at PokerTH.net now runs the

Re: Permission to upload evolution and evolution-data-server to unstable

2010-09-26 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On dim., 2010-09-26 at 15:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 21:00:28 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > I'd like to upload evolution (2.30.3-2, unstable=2.30.3-1, > > testing=2.30.2-1) and evolution-data-server (2.30.3-2, > > unstable=2.30.3-1, testing=2.30.2.1-1) to uns

Re: Permission to upload evolution and evolution-data-server to unstable

2010-09-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 21:00:28 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I'd like to upload evolution (2.30.3-2, unstable=2.30.3-1, > testing=2.30.2-1) and evolution-data-server (2.30.3-2, > unstable=2.30.3-1, testing=2.30.2.1-1) to unstable. There's no change in > shlibs there, so it should disturb uns

Re: Permission to upload gdebi_0.6.4

2010-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 09:55 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 25/09/2010 17:52, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:42 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > >> I'm asking permission to upload (and to be granted subsequent unblock) > >> for gdebi_0.6.4 > > > > Please go ahead with the

Re: Permission to upload gdebi_0.6.4

2010-09-26 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 25/09/2010 17:52, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto: > On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:42 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: >> I'm asking permission to upload (and to be granted subsequent unblock) >> for gdebi_0.6.4 > > Please go ahead with the upload. Uploaded, thanks! -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna

Re: Permission to upload gdebi_0.6.4

2010-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2010-09-25 at 11:42 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > I'm asking permission to upload (and to be granted subsequent unblock) > for gdebi_0.6.4, which fixes an important bug during installation of a > package (#597139), together with a couple of bugs reported in Ubuntu > which affects Debian as

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-09-24 Thread Devid Antonio Filoni
I sent a debdiff between rc2 and the package I would like to upload. It wasn't rc4->0.1.1 but rc2->0.1.1 (my error writing the email). Isn't that enough? Thanks, Devid On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [re-ordered] > > I wrote: Assuming that there are no changes betw

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[re-ordered] I wrote: >>> Assuming that there are no changes between rc4 and 0.1.0, please could >>> you provide a debdiff between 0.1.0~rc2-1 and the 0.1.0-1 package you >>> would like to upload? > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni > wrote: >> Upstream released 0.1.1 which p

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-09-23 Thread Devid Antonio Filoni
Any news about this? Thanks, Devid On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > Upstream released 0.1.1 which provides bugfixes. The attached one is > the debdiff between rc4 and 0.1.1. > > Thanks, > Devid > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: >> On Wed

Re: Permission to upload Tcl/Tk 8.5.9-1

2010-09-21 Thread Sergei Golovan
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> > The reduced diffs are still >  66 files changed, 2137 insertions(+), 1735 deletions(-) > 102 files changed, 3837 insertions(+), 2676 deletions(-) > which I think is too much at this point.  If there are specific bugs you > want fixed in s

Re: Permission to upload Tcl/Tk 8.5.9-1

2010-09-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:24:32 +0400, Sergei Golovan wrote: > Hi release team! > > I'd like to upload a new bugfix release of Tcl/Tk 8.5 (8.5.9-1). The > previous one was 10 months ago, and this release fixes a fair number > of bugs (including crashes). They weren't reported in Debian BTS, but

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-09-20 Thread Damián Viano
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 05:32:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:41 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > I uploaded and it just got accepted. Unfortunately the older autotools did > > break something, it seems that upstream used a broken libtool that used > > /usr/lib64 and /li

Re: Permission to upload ganeti-instance-debootstrap 0.9-2

2010-09-16 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 23:26 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Please upload. > > Thanks. As expected, after uploading, and after pushing the changes to > our git repo, and watching the commit emails, I saw a minor issue. So I > uploaded

Re: Permission to upload ganeti-instance-debootstrap 0.9-2

2010-09-15 Thread Iustin Pop
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:17:40PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:08:59 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:54:01PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a > > > so-far-unreported bu

Re: Permission to upload ganeti-instance-debootstrap 0.9-2

2010-09-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:08:59 +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:54:01PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a > > so-far-unreported bug. The ganeti-instance-debootstrap package contains > > an OS definition for t

Re: Permission to upload ganeti-instance-debootstrap 0.9-2

2010-09-14 Thread Iustin Pop
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 08:54:01PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to upload version 0.9-2 which fixes #596009 and a > so-far-unreported bug. The ganeti-instance-debootstrap package contains > an OS definition for the Ganeti virtualization manager. > […] Kind and hopefully non-intrusi

Re: Permission to upload maxima to testing-proposed-updates for fixing #591862

2010-09-08 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:25:11AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > Dear Release Team, > > Maxima has an RC bug in squeeze (#591862). Unfortunately, the fix for > that bug was made along with a new upstream release. I have just made > a request to the maintainer to handle this issue[1]. However, in t

Re: Permission to upload bugfix/translation updates for remmina stack

2010-09-05 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:07:55 +0200 Julien Cristau ha scritto: > Thanks for the explanations, I've unblocked the last two packages. Thanks! Regarding #595581, I've ready 0.8.3-2 upload fixing it (it's just B-D change, and related changelog entry). Could I proceed with the upload? signa

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-4 (fixes RC bug and locale issues)

2010-09-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 15:22:43 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il giorno Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:23:18 +0200 > Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > > > unblock) for gtg_0.2.4-4. It fixes a RC bug (#595430) and a couple of > > > loc

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-4 (fixes RC bug and locale issues)

2010-09-05 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Sun, 5 Sep 2010 14:23:18 +0200 Julien Cristau ha scritto: > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > > unblock) for gtg_0.2.4-4. It fixes a RC bug (#595430) and a couple of > > locale issues (#595436 and #595440). > > > Ack, let us know when the package

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-4 (fixes RC bug and locale issues)

2010-09-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:27:33 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > unblock) for gtg_0.2.4-4. It fixes a RC bug (#595430) and a couple of > locale issues (#595436 and #595440). > Ack, let us know when the package is accep

Re: Permission to upload bugfix/translation updates for remmina stack

2010-09-05 Thread Julien Cristau
Thanks for the explanations, I've unblocked the last two packages. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Permission to upload bugfix/translation updates for remmina stack

2010-09-05 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Sat, 4 Sep 2010 20:16:44 +0200 Julien Cristau ha scritto: > -if (client->thread) pthread_join (client->thread, NULL); > +while (client->thread) > +{ > +gdk_threads_leave (); > +sleep (1); > +gdk_threads_enter (); > +} > > what's the reasoning for

Re: Permission to upload bugfix/translation updates for remmina stack

2010-09-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:39:26 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > unblocks) for the following packages: > > * remmina_0.8.2-1 +#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 eww. autoconf has AC_SYS_LARGEFILE, and there's getconf LFS_

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-09-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 19:41 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > I uploaded and it just got accepted. Unfortunately the older autotools did > break something, it seems that upstream used a broken libtool that used > /usr/lib64 and /lib64 instead of /usr/lib and /lib so an RPATH was being > hardcoded into t

Re: Permission to upload bugfix/translation updates for remmina stack

2010-09-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 22:39:26 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > I ask permission to upload to unstable (and to be granted subsequent > unblocks) for the following packages: > What's the point of asking for permission if you're going to upload anyway... Cheers, Julien signature.asc Des

Re: Permission to upload security fix release of tryton-modules-stock

2010-09-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 15:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > On Tue, August 31, 2010 21:04, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > > there was just a security fix release for tryton-modules-stock. > > > > > > It provides a security fix to prohibit evaluation of injected code [...] > > > Commitdiff of the Debian

Re: Permission to upload security fix release of tryton-modules-stock

2010-09-01 Thread Mathias Behrle
* Betr.: " Re: Permission to upload security fix release of tryton-modules-stock" (Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:29:01 +0100): > On Tue, August 31, 2010 21:04, Mathias Behrle wrote: > > there was just a security fix release for tryton-modules-stock. > > > > It prov

Re: Permission to upload security fix release of tryton-modules-stock

2010-09-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, August 31, 2010 21:04, Mathias Behrle wrote: > there was just a security fix release for tryton-modules-stock. > > It provides a security fix to prohibit evaluation of injected code > http://hg.tryton.org/1.6/modules/stock/rev/2f6ae3f40ce8 Accessing that URL results in: : No module named

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-30 Thread Damián Viano
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 06:10:27AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:07 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Thanks. The diff looks ok, although the re-autotooling with an older > > > version of auto* makes it

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-08-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 23:50 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:44 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > >> I would like to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0 because there are a lot of > >> fixes since 0.1.0~rc2. There is

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-08-25 Thread Devid Antonio Filoni
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:44 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: >> I would like to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0 because there are a lot of >> fixes since 0.1.0~rc2. There is also a new feature (directconn) which >> will be disabled in the Debian p

Re: Permission to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0

2010-08-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 15:44 +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > I would like to upload msn-pecan 0.1.0 because there are a lot of > fixes since 0.1.0~rc2. There is also a new feature (directconn) which > will be disabled in the Debian package, so this is a bugfixes only > release. How big is the

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 18:07 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Dami

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-24 Thread Damián Viano
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 09:38:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > > > Geany upstream released a bugfix releas

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 16:49 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > > Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I > > > think > > > is worth including i

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-24 Thread Damián Viano
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > > Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I > > think > > is worth including in Squeeze. > > > > Said bugs are: > > - An infinite loop in M

Re: Permission to upload bugfix release of geany

2010-08-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:52 -0300, Damián Viano wrote: > Geany upstream released a bugfix release with some big bugs fixed that I think > is worth including in Squeeze. > > Said bugs are: > - An infinite loop in Markdown lexer > - A segfault on Tools->Reload Configuration when no documents are

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-3 [UPLOADED]

2010-08-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On 08/17/2010 06:03 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Il 11/08/2010 0.38, Philipp Kern ha scritto: You can go ahead with the upload. Please ping us when it got accepted. Uploaded, and accepted. Unblocked. Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-3 [UPLOADED]

2010-08-17 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 11/08/2010 0.38, Philipp Kern ha scritto: > You can go ahead with the upload. Please ping us when it got accepted. Uploaded, and accepted. Thanks! -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Permission to upload new po4a point release

2010-08-16 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Denis, On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 21:43:30 +0200, Denis Barbier wrote: > Hello, > > I am an upstream maintainer of po4a. We released po4a 0.40 in late > July 2010 with a very short string freeze, and we told translators > that they will have a much longer string freeze to update their > transla

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-3 (fixes Important bug)

2010-08-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On 08/10/2010 08:38 AM, Luca Falavigna wrote: Il 07/08/2010 15.50, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: Is there any particular reason why this does not use the defined standard Python library class TemporaryFile (or NamedTemporaryFile)? gtg uses a "fixed" temp file to be able to see if a pre

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:30:49PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:26 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > shorewall{,6} unblocked. > > > > > Please note, the uploaded packages were: > > > > shorewall,

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:26 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > shorewall{,6} unblocked. > > > Please note, the uploaded packages were: > > shorewall, shorewall6, shorewall-lite, shorewall6-lite, shorewall-init Oops; sorry about

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:37:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:30 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > The Shorewall upstream team

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 17:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:37:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:30 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > The Shorewall upstream team was caught off guard by the freeze (I know > > > that this is a recurrin

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 08:37:09PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:30 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > The Shorewall upstream team was caught off guard by the freeze (I know > > that this is a recurring theme). > > > > While the Shorewall team was preparing a new upstr

Re: Permission to upload new Shorewall point release

2010-08-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 21:30 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > The Shorewall upstream team was caught off guard by the freeze (I know > that this is a recurring theme). > > While the Shorewall team was preparing a new upstream release, we > realize that it is excedingly unlikely that the scope of

Re: Permission to upload gtg_0.2.4-3 (fixes Important bug)

2010-08-09 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 07/08/2010 15.50, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: >> Is there any particular reason why this does not use the defined >> standard Python library class TemporaryFile (or NamedTemporaryFile)? > > gtg uses a "fixed" temp file to be able to see if a previous write > attempt was successful, and to use i

Re: Unblock migrate (Was: Re: Permission to upload migrate)

2010-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 19:56:01 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: > I just got the dak mail that the migrate upload has been > accepted. Please unblock. . signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Unblock migrate (Was: Re: Permission to upload migrate)

2010-08-07 Thread Jan Dittberner
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 01:31:10PM -0400, Julien Cristau wrote: > Go ahead. I just got the dak mail that the migrate upload has been accepted. Please unblock. Regards Jan -- Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10 B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 5

Re: Permission to upload migrate

2010-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 18:40:16 +0200, Jan Dittberner wrote: > I'd like to upload version 0.6-4 of migrate to fix RC bug #592102. The > change removes the unneeded dependency on python-codespeak-lib, adds > python-tempita 0.4 to build dependencies (to build more complete API > docs) and bumps Sta

Re: Permission to upload python-httplib2_0.6.0-3 [UPLOADED]

2010-08-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 15:42:16 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Uploaded, and accepted. hint added. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Permission to upload new bugfix-only release of mozplugger (fixes important bug)

2010-08-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, August 7, 2010 11:43, Alessio Treglia wrote: > On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Adam D. Barratt > wrote: >> How big is the diff for that? >> > > attaching the debdiff. Thanks. Part of the temporary file changes - specifically guessTmpFile() - seems... strange. I realise this is largely a

  1   2   3   >