Re: jd uploaded to s-p-u, please accept (was Re: JD package for Lenny point release)

2009-05-15 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi Holger, Thanks to check and your comment. On Sat, 9 May 2009 18:01:46 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > It's better and I've uploaded it now. But please, > > a.) you bumped Standards-Version in debian/control, without mentioning in > debian/changelog, and really you shouldn't have bumped the ve

jd uploaded to s-p-u, please accept (was Re: JD package for Lenny point release)

2009-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Donnerstag, 30. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > henr...@babytalk:~/src/2ch-browser/jd$ debdiff jd_2.0.0-080722-2.dsc > jd_2.0.0-080722-2+lenny1.dsc |diffstat debian/patches/post-cookie.dpatch > | 379 ++ jd-2.0.0-080722/debian/changelog > |7

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-29 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi RM, On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:29:23 +0200 Philipp Kern wrote: > > $ debdiff jd_2.0.0-080722-2.dsc jd_2.0.0-080722-2+lenny1.dsc|diffstat > > debian/patches/post-cookie.dpatch | 2696 > > ++ > > jd-2.0.0-080722/debian/changelog |7 > > jd-2.0.0-080722

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-25 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:33:40 +0200 Philipp Kern wrote: > I am afraid that there are differences in handling packages which have 23000 > users reporting to popcon and 83. First, popcon is disabled by default. And second, 2ch BBS is "anonymous" BBS, so its users don't want to report their

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 08:12:56AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > And for example, at the first point release > > >pidgin Fix failure while connecting to ICQ servers due to protocol > >changes > >postgresql-8.3 New upstream bugfix release > > pidgin deals with protocol changes and p

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-25 Thread Philipp Kern
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:20:38PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie "hana=mogera" was used. > > After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie > > code, so it's big bu

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:06:10 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > If the fix is too intrusive for a lenny point release the way to support it > is > in backports.org, where it already is. I don't think "too intrusive", because no packages are depending on JD package. And is there any wrong side e

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-02 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Hideki, On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > SRMs, would that be ok for 5.0.2? If not, I'd suggest removal from > > stable. > Or put it into volatile, please. Thats a bug, which makes the package unusable, so the solution is either to fix it or to remove it. Volatile is for

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-02 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 17:20:38 +0100 Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie "hana=mogera" was used. > > After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie > > code, so it's big but is needed (to

Re: JD package for Lenny point release

2009-04-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 1. April 2009, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie "hana=mogera" was used. > After the change, JD needs to add functions and fixes for that cookie > code, so it's big but is needed (to make it from "half-broken" to fixed > one). > http://mentor

Re: JD package for Lenny point release (Re: upcoming point releases

2009-04-01 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 06:45:53 +0900 Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Still I'm not sure the stable release managers like such a big diff - or am > > I > > wrong? If so, please comment, I'd be happy to sponsor this to s-p-u Until change happened in BBS, hardcoded cookie "hana=mogera" was used.