Hi, On Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:06:10 +0200 Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> wrote: > If the fix is too intrusive for a lenny point release the way to support it > is > in backports.org, where it already is.
I don't think "too intrusive", because no packages are depending on JD package. And is there any wrong side effect? Its changes is huge, yes, I agree. But it is not depended from other packages. And for example, at the first point release >pidgin Fix failure while connecting to ICQ servers due to protocol >changes >postgresql-8.3 New upstream bugfix release pidgin deals with protocol changes and postgresql is new release. What's the difference with JD package's change? I think it is same issue. (it is like that suddenly protocol is changed, and there was no annouce before that change...) So, please, don't remove jd package from lenny and update (or provide from volatile). -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/iijmio-mail.jp http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
