>
> Hi,
>
> If you use the "flavors" mechanism, the package will probably be named
> kernel-foo-2.2.15-pre19_2.2.15-pre19-1. Might be better to take out the
> dashes, and have it be kernel-foo-2.2.15pre19_2.2.15pre19-1.
>
Ew, that would make it even more complex for boot-floppies. I think Herbe
Hi.
> Date:Thu, 20 Apr 2000 18:28:11 EDT
> To: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> debian-release@lists.debian.org,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From:Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Preparing for
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:52:54AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>
> Upon reflection, I'll just change MINOR to 15 and be done with it. So
> the arch-specific package will look like kernel-foo-2.2.15 2.2.15pre19-1, and
> the arch-independent packages will be kernel-foo-2.2.15pre19 2.2.15pre19-1.
s/ar
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:26:58PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Well it uses the package name, like so:
>
> kernel-image-
>
> which for example on sparc matches
>
> kernel-image-2.2.14-sun4cdm
Upon reflection, I'll just change MINOR to 15 and be done with it. So
the arch-specific package wil
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:36:21AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Uggh, can you make it kernel-foo-2.2.15_2.2.15-pre19-1? This way in the
> > boot-floppies we can actually change the version of the kernel it looks
> > for to 2.2.15,
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 10:17:08AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:05:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Not the package name, just the version. So it just says "2.2.14". There is
> > one entry for each arch.
>
> Well if it's the version then there is no problem since I
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 08:05:22PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Not the package name, just the version. So it just says "2.2.14". There is
> one entry for each arch.
Well if it's the version then there is no problem since I can set the
version to 2.2.15 if needed, I just need the package name to
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:54:30AM +0200, Christian Meder wrote:
>
> Please include this patch from David Miller. Alan Cox already received
> it (according to davem) and it will be in 2.2.15final. Without the
> patch our two Ultra I sparc boxes didn't even survive a one minute
> crashme run ;-)
>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I think we need to get a kernel-source-2.2.15 package in right now, even
> if it means that it is actually a 2.2.15-pre19 (the latest pre). This way
> we can start building images, and have boot-floppies using it. I'm very
> sure it wil
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:18:31AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > >
> > > I think we need to get a kernel-source-2.2.15 package in right now, even
> > > if it means that it is actually a 2.2.
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:28:11PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Uggh, can you make it kernel-foo-2.2.15_2.2.15-pre19-1? This way in the
> boot-floppies we can actually change the version of the kernel it looks
> for to 2.2.15, which is important to get in now, so we don't have to make
> the chang
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:18:31AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > I think we need to get a kernel-source-2.2.15 package in right now, even
> > if it means that it is actually a 2.2.15-pre19 (the latest pre). This way
> > we can start
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:30:27PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> I think we need to get a kernel-source-2.2.15 package in right now, even
> if it means that it is actually a 2.2.15-pre19 (the latest pre). This way
> we can start building images, and have boot-floppies using it. I'm very
> sure it
Previously Ben Collins wrote:
> Herbert, is this possible for you?
If we do this I have this little patch that must be put in as well. I'll
mail it to Herbert.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your c
rom:Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Preparing for first test cycle
> >
> > Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > No. Any such change means aborting the test cycle. This may be
> > > reasonable
> > > if a security problem is bi
>
> Date:Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:54:52 +0200
> To: Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
> From:Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Preparing for firs
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm certainly very much against releasing with known security holes.
> At this moment we already have to do 2.2.15+1patch :(
What does this mean? We'll be using 2.2.15 for potato? Or sticking
with a patched 2.2.14?
I relealize different arches are
Previously Brandon Mitchell wrote:
> I believe the intention is to continue testing with a minor security hole.
However we know there is a major security hole in 2.2.14 for example..
and I won't be surprised if more will be discovered during the testing
cycle. I think we need to have some short-cu
> From: Wichert Akkerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:55 AM
> To: Richard Braakman
> Cc: Martin Schulze; debian-release@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Preparing for first test cycle
>
>
> Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> > No. Any suc
Previously Richard Braakman wrote:
> No. Any such change means aborting the test cycle. This may be reasonable
> if a security problem is big enough, but I'm not going to decide that in
> advance.
I'm certainly very much against releasing with known security holes.
At this moment we already have
On Tue, Apr 18, 2000 at 05:15:28PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Will it be possible to stage the first Test Cycle on or near May 2nd?
> > That's two weeks from now.
> >
> > It means that May 2nd is the last day I make any change to potato, except
> > for changes nee
"J.A. Bezemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please Cc: things like this to -boot and -cd. (I've done this one for you)
That's not necessary since the whole point of debian-release is for
release coordination. Cross-posting is redundant.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will it be possible to stage the first Test Cycle on or near May 2nd?
> That's two weeks from now.
Speaking on behalf of the boot-floppies team, I believe this date is
doable.
boot-floppies 2.2.11 has a *lot* of changes in it (103 line
changelog).
23 matches
Mail list logo
