Previously Richard Braakman wrote: > No. Any such change means aborting the test cycle. This may be reasonable > if a security problem is big enough, but I'm not going to decide that in > advance.
I'm certainly very much against releasing with known security holes. At this moment we already have to do 2.2.15+1patch :( Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
