Re: Please unblock geneweb 4.10-25

2006-12-14 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I see that you lost a db_purge that was in the old version, but isn't >> called anymore in the new postinst. Also, there is a changelog.old (copy > It is called in the postrm. IIRC, not in the postinst. Errr, sure, I meant postrm there. > The old

Re: Please unblock geneweb 4.10-25

2006-12-12 Thread Christian Perrier
> I see that you lost a db_purge that was in the old version, but isn't > called anymore in the new postinst. Also, there is a changelog.old (copy It is called in the postrm. IIRC, not in the postinst. The old version has no db_purge in postinst, but the postrm had one.which I found to be red

Re: Please unblock geneweb 4.10-25

2006-12-12 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This version fixes 4.10-24 (which isn't in testing) where I tried to > be cleaner with regards of the debconf dependency but did not > introduce the Right Fix. > > The change summarizes as : "test if debconf is installed before using > it in the purg

Please unblock geneweb 4.10-25

2006-12-11 Thread Christian Perrier
This version fixes 4.10-24 (which isn't in testing) where I tried to be cleaner with regards of the debconf dependency but did not introduce the Right Fix. The change summarizes as : "test if debconf is installed before using it in the purge target of postrm". This is done with: if [ -e /usr