Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I see that you lost a db_purge that was in the old version, but isn't
>> called anymore in the new postinst. Also, there is a changelog.old (copy
> It is called in the postrm. IIRC, not in the postinst.
Errr, sure, I meant postrm there.
> The old version has no db_purge in postinst, but the postrm had
> one.....which I found to be redundant with stuff automatically added
> by debhelper.
Yeah, that's true. I didn't saw that you use the dh magic in the postrm
from the diff...
So apart from the ugly changelog copy, the package looks OK, so I've
unblocked it.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
251: Hochglanz-Verkaufsprospekt
Das Produkt befindet sich gerade in der allerersten
Konzeptionsphase. (Patrick Piecha)
