On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 06:56 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:53:36 (CET), Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
[...]
> >> If that's too much hassle for you, I can prepare a patch, or even do
> >> an upload.
> >
> > Reinhard, ping
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:53:36 (CET), Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
>> Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
>>
>> > I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
>> > about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenn
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
> Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
>
> > I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
> > about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these
> > users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy (me...@debian.org):
> Well, that's really not fair. Translators could ask the Release Team
> whether it is relevant to consider translating/updating a $package,
I don't really understand where's your point, Mehdi. What we're
talking about is mostly my own energy or Reinhard's
On 11/08/2010 06:22 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
>
>> I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather
>> unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I
>> don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded
Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org):
> I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather unhappy
> about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I don't want these
> users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new package with a minimal
> fix for #601506.
Hmmm, i
On Mon, November 8, 2010 07:06, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> We are currently really not able to accept rc3 in Squeeze because rc3
>> never migrated (since April *2009*). If you are not able to provide
>> security support for it during Sq
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 22:03:41 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 08:50 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>
>> I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't
>> make it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3
>> was already in and don't really reme
On 10/22/2010 08:50 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> I have to admit that I noticed too late that the rc3 version didn't
> make it to testing because of the missing build; I just assumed rc3
> was already in and don't really remember what exactly changed.
> However, I do remember (several) FTBFS
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 18:02:03 (CEST), Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
>> notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
>> on armel. The FTBFS is caus
On 16/10/2010 11:18, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
> notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build
> on armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in
> debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.i
Hi,
While boxbackup was ready at freeze time, unfortuntately, I didn't
notice that it didn't migrate at that time because of a missing build on
armel. The FTBFS is caused by a wrong install pattern in
debian/boxbackup-{client,server}.install files, which is rectified in
the new upload, even for k
12 matches
Mail list logo
