On 11/08/2010 06:22 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Reinhard Tartler (siret...@debian.org): > >> I've spoken to upstream, and they are (of course) also rather >> unhappy about it. Still, since boxackup did work in lenny and I >> don't want these users to be left in the cold, I've uploaded a new >> package with a minimal fix for #601506. > > > Hmmm, including the few debconf changes that were fixed in the > meantime would have been nice too (for instance, I remember about a > full Swedish translation that's included in unstable but not in > testing...that one would help Swedish to reach 100% completion in > squeeze when it comes at debconf templates). >
Well, that's really not fair. Translators could ask the Release Team whether it is relevant to consider translating/updating a $package, especially when testing and sid have different versions. Dropping us a mail to ask is fairly easy and the answer should be quick enough. I've even seen l10n NMUs for packages not present in testing. How's that relevant for a release? Especially when you have very limited resources. IMHO, translators' energy should be spent where needed *only*. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cd86079.60...@debian.org
