Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-22 Thread Andreas Metzler
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.general Ian Jackson wrote: [...] > On previous occasions the release team have said that the freeze would > be applied with respect to the /upload/ date, rather than the > /migration/ date. Ie, packages uploaded before the freeze might > migrate afterwards unhindered,

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:35:41AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > It looks like my recent libassa upload fell afoul of this, but it does > in fact fix a release critical bug in libassa 3.5.1-1. The -dev > package is missing a dependency that makes building against the > library impossible. The change

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Eric Dorland
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote: > Hi, > > I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working > on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate > use of the Urgency field: > > * Urgency high to beat the freeze. > > As mentioned in the last m

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Adam D. Barratt writes ("On the (ab)use of the Urgency field"): > I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on > it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of > the Urgency field: > >* Urgency high to beat t

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 19.06.2012 12:16, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As me

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Tue Jun 19, 2012 at 13:16:33 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on > >it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of > >the Urgency field: >

Re: On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On 19/06/2012 13:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and

On the (ab)use of the Urgency field

2012-06-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of the Urgency field: * Urgency high to beat the freeze. As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various points before that)