* Michael Schutte [Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:32:42 +0200]:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Probably the best idea, unless my hand-built (and partly buggy) ruby19
> > binaries on http://gsyprf10.external.hp.com/~deller/ruby/ may help (see my
> > other mail on the deb
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Probably the best idea, unless my hand-built (and partly buggy) ruby19
> binaries on http://gsyprf10.external.hp.com/~deller/ruby/ may help (see my
> other mail on the debian-hppa list).
May I politely ask you to consider the libdb-
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 08:34:17PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> dann frazier wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>>> Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
>>> I just looked into ruby19 on hppa.
>>> The makecontext()/setcontext()/switchcontext() functions which went into
>>> lib
dann frazier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
I just looked into ruby19 on hppa.
The makecontext()/setcontext()/switchcontext() functions which went into
libc-ports recently [*2] will not help here.
Instead, I think only when at some poi
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:27:06PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 08/08/08 at 16:34 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > libdb-ruby given back, though note that it's not guarenteed to get built
> > > as
> > > keeping the buildd running is more important (ruby1.9 has some nasty
> > > issues)...
>
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 01:14:01AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
>> * Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
>>> ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
>>> the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
>>> I spent h
On 16/08/08 at 21:09 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Otoh, it's really commendable, and I mean it, that you decided to spend
> your time towards having it fixed, rather than just kill ruby1.9 on hppa
> as I suggested (which is, tbh, what I would've done in your position).
> It really sucks that no hp
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 01:10:56PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:14:01PM +, Helge Deller wrote:
> > Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > >hppa has certainly had trouble during this release cycle. However, it's
> > >been mostly reduced to a small set of packages, and since (a) i
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:14:01PM +, Helge Deller wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >hppa has certainly had trouble during this release cycle. However, it's
> >been mostly reduced to a small set of packages, and since (a) it has not
> >been the kind of brekage that prevents the release team from
Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
I spent hours trying to do the hppa porters' work by investigating the
ruby1.9 bui
* Lucas Nussbaum [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:10:16 -0300]:
> ruby1.9 is broken on hppa: 1.9.0.1, that previously built fine (it's in
> the archive) exhibits the same problems as 1.9.0.2 and 1.9.0.3.
> I spent hours trying to do the hppa porters' work by investigating the
> ruby1.9 build failure, with n
Hi,
On 16/08/08 at 17:35 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:02:01 +0200]:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
>
> > > > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:02:01 +0200]:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
> > > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
> > We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 04:51:59PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
>
> > May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
>
> We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with an hppa
> machine to build it for you... (Maybe Frank Lic
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:08:32 +0200]:
> May I now ask you to force libdb-ruby into Lenny?
We need it built on hppa, so you'll have to ask somebody with an hppa
machine to build it for you... (Maybe Frank Lichtenheld or Domenico
Andreoli.)
--
Adeodato Simó
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:13:29PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
>
> > Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> > migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> > again.
>
> libdb-ruby wil
On 09/08/08 at 16:13 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
>
> > Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> > migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> > again.
>
> libdb-ruby will never build
* Michael Schutte [Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:26:57 +0200]:
> Okay, this is bad—it failed indeed. I’m having an eye on libdb-ruby’s
> migration stats. When (if) it enters testing, I’ll come back to you
> again.
libdb-ruby will never build on the hppa buildds, so it'll never be a
candidate for migratio
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
>> libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
>> replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this su
On 08/08/08 at 16:34 -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > libdb-ruby given back, though note that it's not guarenteed to get built as
> > keeping the buildd running is more important (ruby1.9 has some nasty
> > issues)...
>
> I believe that most ruby packages have been disabling on the hppa
> buildds
On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
>> libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
>> replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure
Michael Schutte wrote:
Hi everybody,
At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure is an
unwanted situation. To clean up, I see two possibilities:
(1)
Hi everybody,
At the moment, three near-identical source packages called
libdb4.2-ruby, libdb4.3-ruby, and libdb4.4-ruby are in Lenny. A
replacement for them, libdb-ruby, is on its way there; this sure is an
unwanted situation. To clean up, I see two possibilities:
(1) Remove libdb4.[2-4]-ruby
23 matches
Mail list logo
