ues so far otherwise.
Have a nice day, :)
--
.''`. Étienne Mollier
: :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
`. `' sent from /dev/pts/1, please excuse my verbosity
`-
diff -Nru dcmtk-3.6.7/debian/changelog dcmtk-3.6.7/debian/changelog
--- dcmtk
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1095854 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1095854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hold on, I'm told that this hunk introduces an ABI breakage:
> +--- dcmtk.orig/dcmdata/include/dcmtk/dcmdata/dcelem.h
> dcmtk/dcmdata/include/dcmtk/dcmdata/dcelem.h
> +@@ -143,6 +143,11 @@
> + */
> + virtual OFBool isLeaf() const { return OFTrue; }
> +
> ++
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1095854 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package dcmtk/3.6.7-9~deb12u3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1095854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095854
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025, at 11:34 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 04/10/2024 15:04, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>> Depending on how the freeze timeline looks like, I see a few options:
>> - freeze date for toolchain/key packages is after 2025-02-20, such that a
>> regular upload of 1.85 just work
997 1094001 1094003 1094005 1094006 1094007 1094008 1094171 1094178
1094304 1094312
1093620 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1093620: 1094355
> block -1 with 1093988 1094006
Bug #1094355 [src:adun.app] adun.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout:
hard codes paths in debian
On 04/10/2024 15:04, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
I briefly asked about this a while back on IRC, and thought I had already filed
this formal request/report, but it seems I failed to actually do that
997 1094001 1094003 1094005 1094006 1094007 1094008 1094171 1094178
1094304
1093620 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1093620: 1094312
> block -1 with 1093948 1093950
Bug #1094312 [src:paje.app] paje.app: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout:
hard codes path in debian/rules
1
997 1094001 1094003 1094005 1094006 1094007 1094008 1094171 1094178
1093620 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1093620: 1094304
> block -1 with 1093948 1094171 1094178
Bug #1094304 [src:sogo] sogo: FTBFS with the GNUstep multiarch layout: hard
codes paths in debian/rules
1094304 w
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:03:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Close 1091167
has caused the Debian Bug report #1091167,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-security-support/12+2024.12.22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
package release.debian.org
tags 1091167 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-security-support
ing
Bug #1091167 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-security-support/12+2024.12.22
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1091167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091167
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debian-security-support
Bug #1091167 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-security-support/12+2024.12.22
Added indication that 1091167 affects src:debian-security-support
--
1091167: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-security-supp...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:debian-security-support
[ Reason ]
Please accept debian-security-support 12+2024.12.22 into
the
Hi! I am needing help with my debian! That's my first time having a linux.
I have a laptop that uses Debian 11 and i want to install the debian 12, I
think maybe this update can make some problems of my computer solved.
My laptop is a positivo 64 bits. I'm having a little problem about
Hi!
On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:09:28 +0200
Jonathan carter wrote:
> To vote for your favourite theme, visit the following website and
> click on the "Trixie Artwork Survey" button. From there, you can rank
> your choices from the available options to the My Choices section
> from most preferred to le
Hello Debianites o/
While we don't yet have official freeze dates yet, I can assure you
that it is coming! And with that, it's that time of the development
cycle to choose the desktop artwork to be used in the next Debian
release.
All the fine submissions can be perused
EWS REPORT GENERATED BY AI
-
### Debian Project Announces Critical Security Updates and System
Enhancements
**Date:** October 31, 2024
In a significant move to bolster the security and stability of its
operating system, the Debian Project ha
Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:51:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Closing bugs released with 12.8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080402,
regarding bookworm-pu: package calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
> selection of the Rust release to include in Debian Trixie, and
> > > relatedly, discussions about the freeze schedule for Trixie. We've
> > > heard there may be tentative plans to use Rust 1.83 (which we will
> > > release on 2024-11-28) and to freeze in mid-Janua
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024 at 08:57:48PM +0200, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2024, at 1:49 AM, Travis Cross wrote:
> > Greetings. We understand there to be ongoing discussions about the
> > selection of the Rust release to include in Debian Trixie, and
> > related
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Hi!
I briefly asked about this a while back on IRC, and thought I had already filed
this formal request/report, but it seems I failed to actually do that..
Some background information:
The Rust toolchain
Thanks for the hints. It seems postgresql-common will finally propagate
to testing this night:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-common
[ For the curious: I still do archive rebuilds mostly in testing, but I always
double-check in unstable before reporting, so these anomalies are some ki
Re: Santiago Vila
> Is this really normal/expected, or is there a bug somewhere? (like, for
> example,
> a missing build-dependency which propagated to testing prematurely).
As Adrian already said, everything is normal and under control. As
opposed to "normal" library transitions where everything
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:09:35PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As the subject says, many postgresql-related packages FTBFS in this way:
> (I'm taking postgresql-unit as an example)
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
>dh_clean
>
Hello.
As the subject says, many postgresql-related packages FTBFS in this way:
(I'm taking postgresql-unit as an example)
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_clean
pg_buildext checkcontrol
--- debian/control 2024-09-15 11:58:15.0 +
+++ debian/control
ing
Bug #1080402 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u2
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1080402: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080402
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1080402 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: calamares-settings-debian
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:calamares-settings-debian
Bug #1080402 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u2
Added indication that 1080402 affects src:calamares-settings-debian
--
1080402: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: calamares-settings-deb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:calamares-settings-debian
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
This update fixes two bugs still found in Debian 12 live
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:34:14 +0100
with message-id
<9e3e8b8cd0db3b52d4adb2cfad04baa007c8e3e8.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing bugs for 12.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079350,
regarding bookworm-pu: package calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u1
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 12:43:19PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>...
> What is the opinion of the two porters that we currently have listed
> for armel
>...
I am not in favour of removing armel in trixie.
> Cheers
cu
Adrian
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 08:53:44PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 2024-08-01 07:55:15 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > Should Debian drop armel from the upcoming Debian release?
> >
> > Was there a conclusion to the discussion on d-arm@l.d.o? W
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 05:18:15PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
>...
> There was also a suggestion to mark non-for-us or stop building large
> packages that may not be that useful in the armel architecture, such
> LibreOffice, possibly some desktops, etc.. since armel is mostly meant
> for embedded an
stf&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=ANNO_CLEANUP_ADD&utm_content=001&;>
>
> ----
> Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 257-1
> https://www.debian.org/
> debian-release@lists.debian.org
> <
ing
Bug #1079350 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1079350: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079350
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1079350 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: calamares-settings-debian
Your message dated Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:50:58 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1079040: unblock: rust-debian-copyright/0.1.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079040,
regarding unblock: rust-debian-copyright/0.1.13-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
X-Debbugs-Cc: calamares-settings-deb...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:calamares-settings-debian
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
When launching the desktop icon "Install Debian&quo
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:calamares-settings-debian
Bug #1079350 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
calamares-settings-debian/12.0.9-1+deb12u1
Added indication that 1079350 affects src:calamares-settings-debian
--
1079350: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Plus 1 from me!
Rick
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, at 1:05 AM, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Hello Hector,
> thanks for bringing this up!
>
> On 2024-08-21 05:18, Hector Oron wrote:
>> There was a compelling reason to do at least one more armel release to
>> have at least one official release with time64 suppor
On 2024-08-22 10:05, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Hello Hector,
> thanks for bringing this up!
¡Gracias, Héctor!
> On 2024-08-21 05:18, Hector Oron wrote:
>> There was a compelling reason to do at least one more armel release to
>> have at least one official release with time64 support.
>
> FWIW I thi
Hello Hector,
thanks for bringing this up!
On 2024-08-21 05:18, Hector Oron wrote:
> There was a compelling reason to do at least one more armel release to
> have at least one official release with time64 support.
FWIW I think this makes a lot of sense: have one stable release with
time64 support
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 11:18 AM Hector Oron wrote:
>
> [...]
> There was also a suggestion to mark non-for-us or stop building large
> packages that may not be that useful in the armel architecture, such
> LibreOffice, possibly some desktops, etc.. since armel is mostly meant
> for embedded and
uested a readdition of OpenRD in stable debian-installer
(https://bugs.debian.org/1068898), maybe nice to keep for this one
last release.
There was also a suggestion to mark non-for-us or stop building large
packages that may not be that useful in the armel architecture, such
LibreOffice, possibly some
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-m...@lists.debian.org (was s...@debian.org).
> usertags 1050872 + mips64el
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: mips64el.
> tags 1050872 + security
Bug #1050872 [release.d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock rust-debian-copyright, it is currently blocked
by an autopkgtest "regression" of rust-debian-analyzer on
riscv64, which is caused by the fact that rust-debian-a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock rust-debian-copyright, it is currently blocked
by an autopkgtest "pregression" of rust-debian-analyzer on
riscv64, which is caused by the fact that rust-debian-a
Hi,
On 15-08-2024 20:35, Martin wrote:
What would be the best way, esp. for people outside of Debian, to always
know about such problems? And not only read about it, when it's already
solved?
Ideally bug affecting specific architectures should have the right
usertags. I believe in this
> armhf and the resulting available resources in Debian at this time.
My employer is a user of armel and armhf, but we were not aware of the
problem. I'm pretty sure, my boss had offered a "bug bounty" or
something, if I had insisted.
What would be the best way, esp. for people
Hi,
> On 2024-08-01 07:55:15 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Should Debian drop armel from the upcoming Debian release?
>
> Was there a conclusion to the discussion on d-arm@l.d.o? What is the
> opinion of the two porters that we currently have listed for armel
> (added
Hi Héctor
On 2024-08-01 07:55:15 +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> [ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they
> can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ]
>
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds
[ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they
can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ]
Dear fellow developers,
Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds for this platform:
- https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/
Debian Linux kernel packages
On Sun, Jul 28, 2024, at 1:49 AM, Travis Cross wrote:
> Greetings. We understand there to be ongoing discussions about the
> selection of the Rust release to include in Debian Trixie, and
> relatedly, discussions about the freeze schedule for Trixie. We've
> heard there may be t
They want to apply
for "debian-srbija" as their internet keyword and China (CN) domain names
(debian-srbija.cn, debian-srbija.com.cn, debian-srbija.net.cn,
debian-srbija.org.cn). But after checking it, we find this name conflict with
your company name or trademark. In order to deal w
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend to
continue for the development cycle of Debian Bookworm/Trixie:
For loong64, I
[delete/modify as appropriate]
- submit more bug on this architecture, and attached loong64 parch
- run a Debian testing or
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was a...@debian.org).
> usertags 1070040 - pu
There were no usertags set.
There are now no usertags set.
> usertags 1070040 britney
There were no usertags set.
Hi Jonathan,
I have removed the +1 from version number as you mentioned, and uploaded
to bookworm. Please accept the package.
Jonathan wrote:
> Is this actually a backport of current unstable though? In which case
> it should include the changelog from 1.0.4 and be 1.0.4~deb12u1.
It is *not*
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> diff -Nru extrepo-data-1.0.3/debian/changelog
> extrepo-data-1.0.3+deb12u1+1/debian/changelog
> --- extrepo-data-1.0.3/debian/changelog 2022-10-13 16:27:28.0
> +0200
> +++ extrepo-data-1.0.3+d
sing the
> > > Operating system. This has happened before, thrice recently.
> > >
> > > Additionally the files on /usr/share/doc/dash are wrong.
> > >
> > > The main issues of mutt that I know so far is the documentation is
> > > useless for wh
You've written a lot of text here in a few mails, replying to yourself
several times. This is not a positive pattern.
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:58:18AM +0200, José Luis González González wrote:
>> There are similar issues with boa and dhttpd, and it seems Apache is going
>> that way.
>
>nvi a
sing the
> > > Operating system. This has happened before, thrice recently.
> > >
> > > Additionally the files on /usr/share/doc/dash are wrong.
> > >
> > > The main issues of mutt that I know so far is the documentation is
> > > useless for wh
main issues of mutt that I know so far is the documentation is
> > useless for what I needed, which is using the program, and the package,
> > that was installed, is missing from my computer, besides the maintainer
> > being subversive as well.
> >
> > If this is not s
my computer, besides the maintainer
> being subversive as well.
>
> If this is not solved I will cease to stop using Debian and Debian will
> die.
>
> "Kinda or not"
The problems that I had in 2020 were life or death security problems
that prevented me to use my comp
.
Your subject is wrong, your two RC bugs are not RC bugs; in fact, they both
seem to be describing the same behaviour, and you are requesting that the
behaviour be different. i.e. they are feature requests.
The more I consider your complaints about the Debian maintainer, the less
they seem to hold wa
In days of yore (Sun, 07 Apr 2024), José Luis González thus quoth:
> Hi,
>
> Debian 12 was released with two Release Critical bugs I filed on May
> 20th 2023 (#1036424 and #1036388) on Sylpheed about issues that I
> found on stable, and remain, with Debian 12 released later on J
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:26:49 +0200
José Luis González wrote:
> The maintainer accumulates a lot of bugs for the package, doesn't take
> care about almost all, and when I filed a RC bug because the package
> became unusable to me he downgraded severity to important claiming it
> was just a Gmail is
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:26:49 +0200
José Luis González wrote:
> Debian 12 was released with two Release Critical bugs I filed on May
> 20th 2023 (#1036424 and #1036388) on Sylpheed about issues that I
> found on stable, and remain, with Debian 12 released later on June 10th
> 2023.
T
Hi,
Debian 12 was released with two Release Critical bugs I filed on May
20th 2023 (#1036424 and #1036388) on Sylpheed about issues that I
found on stable, and remain, with Debian 12 released later on June 10th
2023.
The maintainer accumulates a lot of bugs for the package, doesn't take
I would accept such updates in stable now and in the future. What's the
source debdiff this time around?
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:extrepo-data
Bug #1066842 [release.debian.org] Updating extrepo-offline-data in Debian Stable
Added indication that 1066842 affects src:extrepo-data
--
1066842: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066842
Debian Bug Tracking Sys
the thread starting at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/03/msg00076.html]]
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 07:10:28PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 3/7/24 06:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Having said that and not knowing if it doesn't already do that, if
> > extrepro would
On 3/7/24 06:57, Paul Gevers wrote:
Having said that and not knowing if it doesn't already do that, if
extrepro would update a cache when online, it's offline option could
also be refreshed at a convenience moment without the need for an
up-to-date package in stable. I hope it's needless to say
Hi zigo,
Disclaimer: I'm not acting as SRM, the final call is with team members
that do.
On 07-03-2024 12:28 a.m., Thomas Goirand wrote:
So IMO, it'd make a lot of sense to be able to update the
extrepo-offline-data package in Stable, so that Stable (currently
bookworm) would get the latest
Hi,
As you may know, extrepo is a system make it easy to add external
non-official Debian repositories to a Debian system.
Typically, Debian users will use it under Debian Stable, for things
packaged outside of Debian.
Since Bookworm, there's a package called "extrepo-offline-
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062475,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-fai/2024.02.01.2~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062469,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.12.44~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062233,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.23~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1062175,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-install/2.12.10~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061407,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-ports-archive-keyring/2024.01.05~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056222,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:11:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 12.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1056222,
regarding bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:02:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061983,
regarding bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2024.01.30
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:02:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061471,
regarding bullseye-pu: package xerces-c/3.2.3+debian-3+deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:02:58 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061408,
regarding bullseye-pu: package debian-ports-archive-keyring/2024.01.05~deb11u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 10 Feb 2024 13:02:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Released with 11.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054189,
regarding bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
ing
Bug #1061471 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
xerces-c/3.2.3+debian-3+deb11u1
Added tag(s) pending; removed tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1061471: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061471
Debian
package release.debian.org
tags 1061471 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: xerces-c
Version: 3.2.3
package release.debian.org
tags 1062469 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-config
Version
ing
Bug #1062475 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-fai/2024.02.01.2~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1062475: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ing
Bug #1062469 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.12.44~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1062469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062469
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
package release.debian.org
tags 1062475 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-fai
Version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-edu-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:debian-edu-fai
Please accept a new upstream release of debian-edu-fai (targetting Debian
Edu 12
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debian-edu-fai
Bug #1062475 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-fai/2024.02.01.2~deb12u1
Added indication that 1062475 affects src:debian-edu-fai
--
1062475: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062475
Debian
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-edu-con...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:debian-edu-config
Please accept a new upstream release of debian-edu-config to Debian
bookworm. This
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:debian-edu-config
Bug #1062469 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-config/2.12.44~deb12u1
Added indication that 1062469 affects src:debian-edu-config
--
1062469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062469
Deb
ing
Bug #1062233 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-doc/2.12.23~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1062233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
ing
Bug #1056222 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1
Bug #1057891 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1056222 to the same tags previously set
Ignoring request to alter tags o
package release.debian.org
tags 1062175 = bookworm pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bookworm.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: debian-edu-install
Version
ing
Bug #1062175 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package
debian-edu-install/2.12.10~deb12u1
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1062175: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1062175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
1 - 100 of 1339 matches
Mail list logo
