On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:47:26 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Something like a BSD-style license should be fine but the lack of
> "copyleft" might be disliked by the author.
My top recommendations:
Expat (a.k.a. MIT) http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
2-clause BSDhttp://www.gnu.org
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 04:12:33PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:47:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free
> > documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would
> > check it for factual mistakes be
Current version can be found at
http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 07:32:01AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since one of our release goals for etch is to remove any non-DFSG-free
> > documentation from main he
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 02:47:26AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free
> documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would
> check it for factual mistakes before I do so.
Did you intentionally limit the scope to documentation,
I plan to send the following mail about removing non-free
documentation to d-d-a tomorrow. I would welcome if people would
check it for factual mistakes before I do so. Therfore also sending
this to d-legal because of my various statements about the freeness of
certain licenses.
TIA.
*** DRAFT **
5 matches
Mail list logo
