> That knowledge from observing how the archive and testing migration
> software is working right now, in theory what we are seeing is a bug.
Great -- I thought it was something I was supposed to know about and
already should have done as part of dropping the binary package and/or
the transition.
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:03:36PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>>...
>> Also, there is an arch:all missing build of libidn, is that a real
>> problem? Should I do a binary upload to correct it? I thought
>> source-only uploads was sufficient now.
>
> There are no package
Hi
On 30-08-2021 21:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> britney (testing migration software) used to be a bit too liberal on
> letting things migrate, andthere were packages migrating to testing
> despite a binary-all FTBFS (sometimes noone notices for months when a
> -doc package is missing).
That would b
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:19:07PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:03:36PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> >>...
> >> Also, there is an arch:all missing build of libidn, is that a real
> >> problem? Should I do a binary upload to correct it?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 04:03:36PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>...
> Also, there is an arch:all missing build of libidn, is that a real
> problem? Should I do a binary upload to correct it? I thought
> source-only uploads was sufficient now.
There are no packages you could upload, see #993294
Hi! With my ui-utilcpp NMU I think the libidn transition should be
complete, please compare:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libidn.html
but the ben rule is wrong so it matches some packages incorrectly. I'm
not sure about is the clamv reverse dependency, does it have to be
fix
sön 2021-08-22 klockan 17:53 +0200 skrev Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2021-08-22 15:47:43 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > > Please go ahead
> >
> > Thank you -- I have uploaded it now. When it is a good time to
> > close
> > this bug? I don't see anything on
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Relea
> Please go ahead
Thank you -- I have uploaded it now. When it is a good time to close
this bug? I don't see anything on
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions - should I keep
it open until the entire transition has been completed?
/Simon
On 2021-08-22 15:47:43 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > Please go ahead
>
> Thank you -- I have uploaded it now. When it is a good time to close
> this bug? I don't see anything on
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions - should I keep
> it open until the entire transition has
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #992028 [release.debian.org] transition: libidn
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
992028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Simon
On 2021-08-09 13:22:49, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to transition libidn to a newer upstream version, and they
> API/ABI bumped. This is my f
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I want to transition libidn to a newer upstream version, and they
API/ABI bumped. This is my first transition in many years, so I'm
looking for guidance here.
I have uploaded 1.38-1 to experimen
12 matches
Mail list logo
