Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Simon
On 2021-08-09 13:22:49, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hello, > > I want to transition libidn to a newer upstream version, and they > API/ABI bumped. This is my first transition in many years, so I'm > looking for guidance here. > > I have uploaded 1.38-1 to experimental, and it builds everywhere. The > binary package libidn11 is replaced with libidn12; libidn11-dev renamed > to libidn-dev (adding a dummy package with the old name); and > libidn11-java is removed (not setup for java usage properly and <10 > popcon). > > Speaking as upstream of the package, I expect everything to build with > the new version, doing the API/ABI bump was a mistake but it is several > years old by now. > > Reverse dependencies have been built here: > https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libidn/-/pipelines/273580 > > Some comments: > > - clamav: libclamav-dev depends on libidn11-dev needessly: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991976 > - echoping: ftbfs otherwise too, not related to this > - clickhouse: ftbfs due to 2h build timeout on salsa, otherwise should > be okay. > > Is there anything more I should do now? Let me know when I can upload > to unstable. Please go ahead Cheers > > Ben file (based on auto-generated output on the webpage -- not sure this > is correct -- why doesn't it output something in the right format?): > > title = "libidn"; > is_affected = .depends ~ > "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12|libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/"; > is_good = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12)\b/"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/"; > > /Simon -- Sebastian Ramacher
