On 2020-04-28 06:26:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/27/20 5:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 4/25/20 9:09 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >> On 2020-04-25 17:23:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> >>> vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-3) was just uploaded and it FTBFS as reported in
> >>> #958817
On 4/27/20 5:57 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/25/20 9:09 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2020-04-25 17:23:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-3) was just uploaded and it FTBFS as reported in #958817.
>>>
>>> Since it's a key package the RC bug won't trigger autoremo
On 4/25/20 9:09 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2020-04-25 17:23:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-3) was just uploaded and it FTBFS as reported in #958817.
>>
>> Since it's a key package the RC bug won't trigger autoremoval of it and
>> its rdeps like lammps.
>>
>> If #95881
On 2020-04-25 17:23:03, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-3) was just uploaded and it FTBFS as reported in #958817.
>
> Since it's a key package the RC bug won't trigger autoremoval of it and
> its rdeps like lammps.
>
> If #958817 is not fixed soon, rebuilds in testing-proposed-up
vtk7 (7.1.1+dfsg2-3) was just uploaded and it FTBFS as reported in #958817.
Since it's a key package the RC bug won't trigger autoremoval of it and
its rdeps like lammps.
If #958817 is not fixed soon, rebuilds in testing-proposed-updates like
for hdf5 may be required to enable migration of netcdf
On 2020-04-22 09:56:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 4/21/20 9:45 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Thanks.
>
> netcdf (1:4.7.4-1) is built & installed on all release architectures,
> and ports where possible.
>
> Please schedule the binNMUs.
Scheduled the binNMUs for
On 4/21/20 9:45 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks.
netcdf (1:4.7.4-1) is built & installed on all release architectures,
and ports where possible.
Please schedule the binNMUs.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #955807 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #955807 to the same tags previously set
--
955807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.d
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #955807 [release.debian.org] transition: netcdf
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
955807: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=955807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On 2020-04-05 08:26:10, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html
> Control: block
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html
Control: block -1 by 955715 955749 955806
NetCDF bumped it SONAME requiring a transition.
Most rdeps b
11 matches
Mail list logo