Le mardi 08 octobre 2019 à 20:40 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> On 08-10-2019 14:07, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > All packages concerned by this transition are now fixed, the only
> > exception being octave-mpi. For the latter, I suggest that it be
> > removed from testing, because the fix is not
Hi Sébastien,
On 08-10-2019 14:07, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> All packages concerned by this transition are now fixed, the only
> exception being octave-mpi. For the latter, I suggest that it be
> removed from testing, because the fix is not obvious, and upstream has
> to be involved.
I'll hint
Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 21:35 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 09:14 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
> > Octave has now been built everywhere. Will you take care of all the
> > failures in the reverse build depends? There are 16 packages that need
> > your attenti
Le jeudi 03 octobre 2019 à 09:14 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> Octave has now been built everywhere. Will you take care of all the
> failures in the reverse build depends? There are 16 packages that need
> your attention before octave can migrate. I filed one FTBFS bug already,
> but waiting for
Control: block 934630 by 919641
Hi Sébastien,
On 02-10-2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> However this time it failed to build on all arches, because of texinfo
> 6.7.0.dfsg.2-2 which was buggy. Since then, texinfo 6.7.0.dfsg.2-3 has
> been uploaded which should fix that. Can you please give
Processing control commands:
> block 934630 by 919641
Bug #934630 [release.debian.org] transition: octave
934630 was not blocked by any bugs.
934630 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 934630: 919641
--
934630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934630
Debian Bug T
On 02/10/2019 10:30, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mardi 01 octobre 2019 à 20:34 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and
>>> I could reproduce it on the porterbox.
>
> […]
>
>>> I’m
On 01/10/2019 20:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and
>> I could reproduce it on the porterbox.
>>
>> For a given C++ source file, the generated assembly file is 303Mb
>>
Le mardi 01 octobre 2019 à 20:34 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and
> > I could reproduce it on the porterbox.
[…]
> > I’m tempted to drop -g for that particular file and particu
Hi Sébastien,
On 01-10-2019 17:35, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> It failed to build for a 3rd time. So the problem is not transient, and
> I could reproduce it on the porterbox.
>
> For a given C++ source file, the generated assembly file is 303Mb
> large. Then the assembler hits the virtual space
Le lundi 30 septembre 2019 à 20:45 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> On 30-09-2019 13:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > The new version (5.1.0-2) is now uploaded and built on all release
> > > architectures, except on mipsel. The build failure
Hi Sébastien,
On 30-09-2019 13:43, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
>>> wrote:
Please
On 30/09/2019 11:56, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
>> wrote:
>>> Please schedule a transition for octave 5.
>>>
>>> Most reverse dependencies ha
Hi Paul,
Le dimanche 29 septembre 2019 à 21:57 +0200, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
> wrote:
> > Please schedule a transition for octave 5.
> >
> > Most reverse dependencies have already been updated by the Debian Octave
> > Grou
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sébastien,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:53:33 +0200 =?utf-8?q?S=C3=A9bastien_Villemot?=
wrote:
> Please schedule a transition for octave 5.
>
> Most reverse dependencies have already been updated by the Debian Octave Group
> and should therefore be compatible with the ne
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-octave.html
Dear Release Team,
Please schedule a transition for octave 5.
Most reverse dependencies have already
16 matches
Mail list logo
