On 03/12/16 17:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 12/03/2016 12:29 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 03/11/16 13:53, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>>> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
>>> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few pack
On 12/03/2016 12:29 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/11/16 13:53, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
>> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
>> Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thu
On 03/11/16 13:53, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable,
> as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in
> Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thus I expect binNMUs to behave
> better in Debian. And I comm
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 14/11/16 21:54, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Please retry the osmium-tool builds that FTBFS with libosmium 2.10.0,
> I've reverted libosmium back to 2.9.0 until upstream has fixed the IdSet
> issues introduced in 2.10.0.
>
> dw osmium-tool_1.4.0-2 . amd64 arm64 mi
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #843051 [release.debian.org] transition: boost1.62
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
843051: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843051
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Please retry the osmium-tool builds that FTBFS with libosmium 2.10.0,
I've reverted libosmium back to 2.9.0 until upstream has fixed the IdSet
issues introduced in 2.10.0.
dw osmium-tool_1.4.0-2 . amd64 arm64 mips64el ppc64el . -m
'libosmium2-dev (>= 2.10.0really2.9.0)'
I think the sfcgal builds
Control: retitle -1 transition: boost1.62
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertag -1 transition
Control: block -1 by 842927
On 11/03/2016 01:53 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
Please use reportbug in the future to have
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 transition: boost1.62
Bug #843051 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: boost1.62 transition
Changed Bug title to 'transition: boost1.62' from 'release.debian.org:
boost1.62 transition'.
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hello,
boost-defaults has already been accepted to effectively start the
boost1.62 transition. Quite speedy NEW queue processing there.
smr and I, debate taking boost1.62 transition because it is a relatively
small jump; and there are openssl fixes. (
9 matches
Mail list logo
