Control: retitle -1 transition: boost1.62 Control: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org Control: usertag -1 transition Control: block -1 by 842927
On 11/03/2016 01:53 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal Please use reportbug in the future to have it set the appropriate usertag. > boost-defaults has already been accepted to effectively start the > boost1.62 transition. Quite speedy NEW queue processing there. > > smr and I, debate taking boost1.62 transition because it is a relatively > small jump; and there are openssl fixes. (boost doesn't directly link > against openssl, but the exposed templates do use openssl, thus boost is > entagled transitively into openssl transition for packages that use > relevant boost templates). > > The rebuild results look ok: > http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/boost1.62.html > > Whilst this is Ubuntu transition tracker, many results are transferable, > as it covers 6 out 10 release architecutres. There are a few packages in > Ubuntu that are not in Debian Testing, thus I expect binNMUs to behave > better in Debian. And I commit to fixing outstanding packages to the > best of my ability to complete this transition swiftly. #842927 likely affects more python packages that build-depend on libboost-python-dev. That should be fixed before the binNMUs cause all those packages to FTBFS. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
