Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-25 Thread Mike Miller
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:24:39 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > So the two rdeps can just be binNMU'ed, right? If so, please go ahead and > upload > openconnect to unstable. I am able to rebuild the versions of both rdeps in unstable against a local experimental sbuild chroot, so yes I be

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-25 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 24/05/15 16:14, Mike Miller wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 20:10:03 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >> Ok, please come back to us when it's all ready. > > The blockers for this bug have all been fixed, ok to upload openconnect > to unstable now? So the two rdep

Processed: Re: Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 = confirmed Bug #784924 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 784924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784924 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-24 Thread Mike Miller
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 20:10:03 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Ok, please come back to us when it's all ready. The blockers for this bug have all been fixed, ok to upload openconnect to unstable now? Thanks, -- mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2015-05-10 20:02, Mike Miller wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:57:36 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Are the updated packages tested against the libopenconnect5 in experimental? Do they need to happen in sync with libopenconnect5 or can they be done in advance? I expect both rdeps can b

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Mike Miller
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 18:57:36 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Are the updated packages tested against the libopenconnect5 in > experimental? Do they need to happen in sync with libopenconnect5 or can > they be done in advance? I expect both rdeps can be updated with or without libopenconnect

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: block -1 784921 Control: block -1 784922 Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-openconnect.html On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 01:46:10PM -0400, Mike Miller wrote: > Please create a transition slot for the new libopenconnect5 library > p

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #784924 [release.debian.org] transition: openconnect Added tag(s) moreinfo. > block -1 784921 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > block -1 784922 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > forwarded -1 https://release.

Bug#784924: transition: openconnect

2015-05-10 Thread Mike Miller
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, Please create a transition slot for the new libopenconnect5 library package. The current upstream version 7.06 providing this library is already packaged and available