Hi,
Thanks Andreas for your work on util-linux, it’s really appreciated.
Le 15/11/2014 17:57, Andreas Henriksson a écrit :
> I really don't understand why we're having this discussion now at all.
> Where where everyone before the freeze?
The whole message seems unneededly harsh, but as a data p
Andreas Henriksson writes:
> I see a cron job as a complement that caters to the niche which does not
> use the default init in Jessie. Saying that people who don't install
> cron don't get their SSDs trimmed is just stupid. Speciall since
> installing cron also pulls in a full MTA. Why would any
Hello intrigeri!
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 12:51:53PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Agreed. I think we should ship the cronjob by default in Jessie.
> Andreas, what do you think?
What I've seen so far is people suggesting to use a cron job
/instead of/ the systemd units shipped by upst
Hi Andreas,
Martin Pitt wrote (10 Nov 2014 09:19:06 GMT) :
> I agree. In Ubuntu we've carried this for a while now:
> | $ cat /etc/cron.weekly/fstrim
> | #!/bin/sh
> | # trim all mounted file systems which support it
> | /sbin/fstrim --all || true
> This is init system agnostic, and with anacron
Russ Allbery [2014-11-06 22:13 -0800]:
> The concern with the service unit is that it's only a service unit with no
> corresponding init script. If the behavior is a good idea, we should do
> it regardless of the init system, I would think
I agree. In Ubuntu we've carried this for a while now:
|
Andreas Henriksson writes:
> Apart from that, others have expressed that we're apparently not yet
> mentally ready for shipping systemd units in Debian.
I wouldn't put it quite this way. Rather, I'd say that maintaining
feature parity between sysvinit and systemd wherever possible for jessie
is
Gerrit Pape writes:
> Hi, installing the unit files, which AFAICS entered jessie quite
> recently, also introduced a dependency on init-system-helpers and in
> turn on perl, making perl pseudo-essential (#757891). Can we revert
> this too?
Any package shipping systemd units, which will certainl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:26:04PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Hi, installing the unit files, which AFAICS entered jessie quite
> recently, also introduced a dependency on init-system-helpers and in
> turn on perl, making perl pseudo-essential (#757891). Can we revert
> this too?
This dependency
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:13:01PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Explanation of changes:
>
> Martin Pitt reported fstrim taking a long time on his system and
> in combination with init-system-helpers (dh_systemd) starting
> the fstrim /service/ in postinst this will make the package
> upgrade
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 05:09:43PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Why not do that in postinst when you know deb-systemd-helper is
> available?
You mean switch from preinst upgrade to postinst configure...
sure could do that. On the other hand, if we're upgrading
from the given version then we alre
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 14:13:01 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> diff -Nru util-linux-2.25.2/debian/util-linux.preinst
> util-linux-2.25.2/debian/util-linux.preinst
> --- util-linux-2.25.2/debian/util-linux.preinst 1970-01-01
> 01:00:00.0 +0100
> +++ util-linux-2.25.2/debian/uti
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I'm seeking pre-approval for a not-yet-uploaded version
of util-linux.
Justification: probably better to revert and postpone to Jessie+1.
Bug number/severity: #767194 important
Changelog en
12 matches
Mail list logo
