Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

2013-01-22 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
> > If you think that it it better to take only the first and the last chunk, > > just tell me. > I would prefer that, yes. Otherwise no objections, please ping the bug when > it's uploaded. ok, I remove the undesired part. The last chunck was changed a little bit since it contains also the r

Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

2013-01-22 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:05:02PM +, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks > > patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the > > argument? Did I miss something significant? > > > Yes in fact I took the

Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

2013-01-22 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
> Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks > patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the > argument? Did I miss something significant? Yes in fact I took the patch from the upstream and adapt the rules file to use the renamed option. If you

Bug#698467: RE : Bug#698467: unblock: taurus/3.0.0-2

2013-01-19 Thread PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel
>The diff you sent doesn't contain these patches... Sorry about that, I did the debdiff with the .dsc but. So here the 2 patches Cheers FredFrom: =?UTF-8?q?Picca=20Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric-Emmanuel?= Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:20:39 +0100 Subject: upstream fix for the FTBFS due to image conversion -