On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 08:05:02PM +0000, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote: > > Perhaps I'm wrong, but from what I can see only the first and last hunks > > patching setup.py are actually relevant, the rest just renames the > > argument? Did I miss something significant? > > > Yes in fact I took the patch from the upstream and adapt the rules file to > use the > renamed option. > > If you think that it it better to take only the first and the last chunk, > just tell me.
I would prefer that, yes. Otherwise no objections, please ping the bug when it's uploaded. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 <directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from 8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits layered on top of bonghits
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
