Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 639645 + pending
Bug #639645 [release.debian.org] opu: package xpdf/3.02-1.4+lenny4
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639645: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
tag 639645 + pending
thanks
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 18:59 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:48 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > >> DSA 2388 appears to have resolved all of those issues, so I guess we
> > >> could loo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 639645 + confirmed
Bug #639645 [release.debian.org] opu: package xpdf/3.02-1.4+lenny4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
639645: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
tag 639645 + confirmed
thanks
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 10:48 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >> DSA 2388 appears to have resolved all of those issues, so I guess we
> >> could look at an update containing just the insecure tempfile change?
> >
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> DSA 2388 appears to have resolved all of those issues, so I guess we
>> could look at an update containing just the insecure tempfile change?
>
> Yes, that's correct. I'll ready a new package.
Please review the attached patch that address
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
>> version of freetype there has some known issues.
>>
>> Attached is a new debdiff for this proposed-update.
>
>
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
> version of freetype there has some known issues.
>
> Attached is a new debdiff for this proposed-update.
+xpdf (3.02-1.4+lenny4) oldstable-proposed-updates; urgency=low
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:19:57PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > In any case, I'm not entirely convinced that a NEWS file is the
> > > right location to be making a statement that seems in danger of
> > > approaching "this package isn't getting security support i
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > In any case, I'm not entirely convinced that a NEWS file is the
> > right location to be making a statement that seems in danger of
> > approaching "this package isn't getting security support in lenny".
>
> So, an EOL could be declared on t1lib, but there are many depen
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this]
>
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
> > version of freetype there has some known issues.
>
> What's the feasibility o
[Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on this]
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
> version of freetype there has some known issues.
What's the feasibility of fixing the issues in freetype?
> At
I've decided that it's too risky to disable t1lib in lenny as the
version of freetype there has some known issues.
Attached is a new debdiff for this proposed-update.
Best wishes,
Mike
xpdf-lenny.debdiff
Description: Binary data
12 matches
Mail list logo
