Michael Gilbert wrote: > > In any case, I'm not entirely convinced that a NEWS file is the > > right location to be making a statement that seems in danger of > > approaching "this package isn't getting security support in lenny". > > So, an EOL could be declared on t1lib, but there are many dependencies > on it. So, I saw the news file as more of a tool to educate the user > on what to do to disable t1lib if they actually see these issues as > concerns. Another possibility would be to set t1lib=no in the default > xpdfrc (which disables it) with instructions in NEWS.Debian on how to > reenable it.
Any thoughts on what the right thing to do is here? Whatever the decision, that's what I'll implement, and I would really like to get this into the upcoming lenny proposed-update. Thanks, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110928211957.c3d0f5048e0f263796241...@gmail.com