[ Re-sent to the right recipients. ]
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> All new versions of the core GNUstep packages are already in
> experimental. A routine rebuild revealed only 6 bugs, all of them
> having a fix available now:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> All new versions of the core GNUstep packages are already in
> experimental. A routine rebuild revealed only 6 bugs, all of them
> having a fix available now:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=tag&users=pkg-gnus
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:48:57AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
[…]
> libgnustep-base1.20 vs libgnustep-base1.22
> libgnustep-gui0.18 vs libgnustep-gui0.20
O
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> We'd like to have a list of packages which are part of this transition.
Dependency level 1 (build-depends only on libgnustep-base-dev):
biococoa
gnustep-netclasses
mknfonts.tool
oolite
pantomime1.2
Dependency level 2 (build-depend
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 19:34:46 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't understand the question -- do you want a list of
> other (non-GNUstep) libraries possibly affecting the transition
> (poppler, ffmpeg, etc.) or you'd like to know which of the GNUstep
> packages depend on gnustep-gui
At Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:39:10 +0200,
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
> > > (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:13:47 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
> > (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
> > libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 02:03:58AM +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
> (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
> libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
> testing (or even better, before that).
That seems
On 06/08/2011 08:19 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>>> 1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
>>>testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
>>>GNUstep deve
Hi,
I've a hard time understanding what the current status of this
transition is. Anyone willing to sum up?
(I'm interested in it as it blocks #619602 - ITP: theunarchiver.)
Bye,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > 1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
> >testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
> >GNUstep development in wheezy broken, just like it is now in
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 21:44:15 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> 1) The modified gnustep-make package will have no trouble migrating to
>testing (before the transition even commences), so it would make
>GNUstep development in wheezy broken, just like it is now in sid.
>
Broken how?
> 2) Bu
Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 01:33 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > gnustep-base/1.22.0-1 currently build-depends on gobjc (>= 4:4.6).
> > My plan was to change it to "gobjc (>= 4:4.6) [!ia64 !sparc],
> > gobjc-4.6". Is that good enough?
>
> no, for that case, you need to use gcc-4.6 as the
On 06/07/2011 01:33 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>>> We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
>>> (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
>>> libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defa
Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
> > (libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
> > libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
> > testing (or even better, before that
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20->1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18->0.20) *and*
libobjc2->3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
testing (
17 matches
Mail list logo
