Processed: Re: Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 619850 + pending Bug #619850 [release.debian.org] pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619850: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 619850 + pending thanks On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:24:28 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: Hi Adam, On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:21:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 22:11 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > # Therefore Debian doesn't offer official security support for this package.

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-18 Thread Guido Günther
Hi Adam, On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:21:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tag 619850 + squeeze confirmed > thanks > > On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 22:11 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:56:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > > > I do note that the discussion bef

Processed: Re: Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 619850 + squeeze confirmed Bug #619850 [release.debian.org] pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff Added tag(s) squeeze and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 619850: http://bu

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-17 Thread Adam D. Barratt
tag 619850 + squeeze confirmed thanks On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 22:11 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:56:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > > > I do note that the discussion before the release about updating iceowl > > > > > in stable very much implied that securit

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-12 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:56:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 09:25 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 04:57:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-06-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 09:25 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 02:35:19PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 04:57:53PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:27 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:, > > > > I'd like to push iceowl 1.0~b1+d

Bug#619850: pu: package iceowl/1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1.diff

2011-04-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[Apologies for managing to miss this earlier] Hi, On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 22:27 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:, > I'd like to push iceowl 1.0~b1+dfsg2-2.squeeze1 to squeeze proposed > updates. It contains the same updates as current icedove. Presumably this now requires a further update, in light of