Hi Adam, On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:21:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > tag 619850 + squeeze confirmed > thanks > > On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 22:11 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 07:56:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > > > I do note that the discussion before the release about updating > > > > > > iceowl > > > > > > in stable very much implied that security updates would be pushed > > > > > > via > > > > > > the security archive, albeit not as the security team's top > > > > > > priority. > > > > > > > > > > The update in stable was necessary to move iceowl to the same codebase > > > > > as icedove/xulrunner making it possible to reuse the patches. I'm > > > > > putting the security team on cc: so we can figure out how to best get > > > > > the updated iceowl versions into stable. > > > > > > ... this. There doesn't appear to have been any follow-up from the > > > security team on the bug; has there been any discussion elsewhere? > > > > Not that I know of. I think README.Debian still holds: > [...] > > # Therefore Debian doesn't offer official security support for this package. > > > > Nevertheless we should fix what is easily fixable. > > Ack, and apologies again for the delays. Please go ahead, bearing in > mind that the acceptance window for 6.0.2 closes over the weekend. Uploaded now. Thanks a lot! -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110618102428.gb19...@bogon.sigxcpu.org
