Adam D. Barratt writes:
> On Fri, August 27, 2010 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Ð 10:03 +0100 на 27.08.2010 (пÑ), Adam D. Barratt напиÑа:
> >> On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> >> > Sure, does this mean that with this change the update is approved and
> >> > can be
On Fri, August 27, 2010 10:28, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Ð 10:03 +0100 на 27.08.2010 (пÑ), Adam D. Barratt напиÑа:
>> On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> > Sure, does this mean that with this change the update is approved and
>> > can be uploaded?
>>
>> I'd prefer a look
В 10:03 +0100 на 27.08.2010 (пт), Adam D. Barratt написа:
> On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > Sure, does this mean that with this change the update is approved and
> > can be uploaded?
>
> I'd prefer a look at an updated debdiff first; I don't envisage there
> being any other
On Fri, August 27, 2010 09:26, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:06:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 17:49 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>> > I disagree, it is me who failed to catch that and forgot to pass
>> > -Xvar/lib/aspell to dh_md5sums while preparing
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:06:07AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 17:49 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > I disagree, it is me who failed to catch that and forgot to pass
> > -Xvar/lib/aspell to dh_md5sums while preparing -11.
>
> How about doing this for 3.0-9+lenny1 as well?
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 17:49 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Георги Данчев wrote:
> > I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be
> > avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the
> > postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated
> > fi
Russ Allbery writes:
> Julien Cristau writes:
> > Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time
> > the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong.
>
> This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some
> time, long enough that there's
Julien Cristau writes:
> Shipping such a file in the package means it'll get emptied every time
> the package in re-installed or upgraded. That sounds wrong.
This is weird, but the aspell packages have been doing this for quite some
time, long enough that there's an explicit exception in Lintia
Георги Данчев wrote:
> I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be
> avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the
> postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated
> files as FAILED, which is to be expected. I failed to catch that, so
Yavor Doganov writes:
> Георги Данчев wrote:
> > I agree, that 'automatically removed by dpkg' games are best to be
> > avoided for regenerated files, and it is saner to remove them in the
> > postrm, since now debsums aspell-bg lists these three regenerated
> > files as FAILED, which is to be expe
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:39:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> So, should we proceed with that package the way it is?
>
I'd rather you didn't introduce that bug in stable (I'm no SRM though).
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Yavor Doganov writes:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by
> > > update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature.
> >
> > Then why is it shipped
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:39:04PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > These files are supposed to be regenerated in postinst by
> > update-dictcommon-aspell; that's a feature.
> >
> Then why is it shipped in the package? Is it just so
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> > > > +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is
> >
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
> > +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is not
> > +# deleted upon remove/purge.
> > + >debian/aspell-bg/var/lib/aspell/bg-en.rws
>
> Ship
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 16:30:56 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:44:58AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> >
> > > +# Make sure dpkg knows about bg-en.rws too, otherwise the file is not
> > > +# deleted upon re
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 15:42:24 +0300, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> diff -u bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
> --- bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
> +++ bgoffice-3.0/debian/rules
> @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@
> # $WORDLIST is the wordlist filename minus the .*wl.gz extension)
> install -d d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please allow an update of bgoffice in stable to fix #589851.
The bug is fixed in squeeze (3.0-11); minimalistic debdiff follows:
diff -u bgoffice-3.0/debian/changelog bgoffice-3.0/debian/changel
18 matches
Mail list logo
