Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[This was answered on IRC, but for completeness...] On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 13:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > > ok, then maybe something is broken with > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash > > > because

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 11:42 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > ok, then maybe something is broken with > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash > > because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64? > > It's a feature. > > Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display bin

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:25 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > maybe you did not fetch all, the amd64 package of gnucash, version > > > 2.2.9-4, is also broken

Re: Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-19 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > > > Micha Lenk writes: > > > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libg

Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > > Micha Lenk writes: > > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account > > > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)

Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 12:58 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Micha Lenk writes: > > nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account > > for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)" > > *sigh* > > I'm amazed that the libgoffice-0.8 package is fi

Bug#570346: nmu: gnucash_2.2.9-4

2010-02-18 Thread Micha Lenk
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnucash_2.2.9-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against libgoffice-0.8 to account for uncoordinated soname bump (closes: #570152)" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian