Hi, On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:25 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 18.02.2010, 23:22 +0000 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 23:58 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > > maybe you did not fetch all, the amd64 package of gnucash, version > > > 2.2.9-4, is also broken and needs a rebuild. > > > > That rebuild was indeed scheduled earlier today; gnucash_2.2.9-4+b1 on > > amd64 depends on "libgoffice-0-8 (>= 0.8.0)" and was installed in to the > > archive during the 19:52 dinstall tonight. > > ok, then maybe something is broken with > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gnucash > because only 2.2.9-4 is listed for amd64?
It's a feature. Both /status/package.php and /pkg.cgi only display binNMUs until they're uploaded, and then revert to the source version. This is a side-effect of the fact that wanna-build only stores the binNMU information during the time between the binNMU being scheduled and it being uploaded; the wanna-build commands used to build the pages therefore only output references to the binNMU version during that time. https://buildd.debian.org/build.cgi?pkg=gnucash shows logs for all versions of the package, including binNMUs. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1266579742.5435.5238.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
