Hi Emilio,
Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-19:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on 2025-02-18:
> > On 15/02/2025 18:50, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell, everything is good, and outstanding issues
> > > are now out of the way.
> >
> > Thanks for the rebuilds and analysis. Go ahead.
>
> You
Hi Emilio,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, on 2025-02-18:
> On 15/02/2025 18:50, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, everything is good, and outstanding issues
> > are now out of the way.
>
> Thanks for the rebuilds and analysis. Go ahead.
You're welcome, I see Mathieu Malaterre went ahead.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #1095266 [release.debian.org] transition: dcmtk
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
1095266: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 15/02/2025 18:50, Étienne Mollier wrote:
Greetings,
Current status is the following.
Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-15:
* The following 1 is pending resolution of #1096017:
- orthanc
Sébastien Jodogne fixed the issue (Thanks!).
* The following 8 depe
Greetings,
Current status is the following.
Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-15:
> * The following 1 is pending resolution of #1096017:
>
> - orthanc
Sébastien Jodogne fixed the issue (Thanks!).
> * The following 8 depend on #1096017 to be fixed in orthanc
> before statusing further:
>
Greetings from Debian Med Sprint at Berlin,
Out of the 15 packages that regressed with the newer dcmtk
3.6.9, I found out that:
* The following 1 is pending resolution of #1096017:
- orthanc
* The following 8 depend on #1096017 to be fixed in orthanc
before statusing further:
-
Hi,
Here are the results of my rebuild of reverse build dependencies
of dcmtk. Out of the 35 packages identified by ratt, I have:
* alicevision is a contrib package and for the moment I have
not setup my build infra to pull the necessary non-free
build dependency.
* The 7 following
Control: severity 1094895 serious
Étienne Mollier, on 2025-02-12:
> I checked camitk for instance, and
> apparently this is no regression but already a problem in sid.
Given my build logs, this is actually #1094895, setting its
severity accordinly now that itk5.4 moved to unstable.
Have a good n
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Malaterre, on 2025-02-12:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:52 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> wrote:
> > What about its rdeps? Do they build against the new version?
>
> Étienne would you be able to do your magic to mass-rebuild the rdeps ?
> Thank you very much !
I can't really tel
Emilio,
On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:52 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2025 08:11, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: dc...@packages.debian.org
> > Co
On 06/02/2025 08:11, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: dc...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dcmtk
I am filling a bug report asking for the transition for dcmtk 3.6.9
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: dc...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dcmtk
I am filling a bug report asking for the transition for dcmtk 3.6.9.
DCMTK 3.6.9 builds fine on all release archs:
12 matches
Mail list logo
