Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-02-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Tuesday, February 4, 2025 2:41:57 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > > Regarding redmine, #1094049 was fixed in 5.1.3+ds-6, but now there's > > #1095148 (related to the nokogiri update). So it would still be better > > to remove redmine from testing for now (together with its reverse > > dependencie

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-02-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 31/01/25 at 07:05 -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Could we also remove redmine from testing for now? We have this RC bug: > #1094049. > > It is right now blocked by the ruby-rack 3 transition, which should take > some time. I'd like to finish the ruby3.3 transition before that. > > With the re

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-31 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 07:34:36 -0300 Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > On 29/01/2025 07:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 29/01/2025 10:14, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:12:14 +0100 Antonio Terceiro > >> wrote: > >>  > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:53:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-29 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
On 29/01/2025 07:30, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 29/01/2025 10:14, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:12:14 +0100 Antonio Terceiro wrote:  > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:53:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:  > > Thanks Emilio! The ruby team is holding a sprint this week and w

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 29/01/2025 10:14, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:12:14 +0100 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:53:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Thanks Emilio! The ruby team is holding a sprint this week and we are all > > working on this. > > > > Due to our ana

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-29 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 18:12:14 +0100 Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:53:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Thanks Emilio! The ruby team is holding a sprint this week and we are all > > working on this. > > > > Due to our analysis, I'd like to request the following remova

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-28 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 12:53:47PM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Thanks Emilio! The ruby team is holding a sprint this week and we are all > working on this. > > Due to our analysis, I'd like to request the following removals from > testing: > > * cvsdelta/1.7.0-8 - has rc bug #1094443 > * hier

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-28 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
On Sun, 26 Jan 2025 20:30:50 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 24/01/2025 02:07, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User:release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Hi, > > > > As discu

Processed: Re: Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1093944 [release.debian.org] transition: ruby3.3-default Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 1093944: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1093944 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 24/01/2025 02:07, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, As discussed with Emilio, we are going to start the transition to switch the default ruby to version 3.3, wh

Bug#1093944: transition: ruby3.3-default

2025-01-23 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, As discussed with Emilio, we are going to start the transition to switch the default ruby to version 3.3, while keeping version 3.1 as an alternative interpreter. He allowed me, on