Re: Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-21 Thread Johannes Ring
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:32:56 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau >> wrote: >> > If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that >> > needs to be reflected in the packa

Re: Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:32:56 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau > wrote: > > If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that > > needs to be reflected in the package dependencies. > > Okay, but I'm unsure how to do that. Cur

Re: Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-15 Thread Johannes Ring
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that > needs to be reflected in the package dependencies. Okay, but I'm unsure how to do that. Currently I have "Build-Depends: swig2.0" in the source package and "Depends:

Re: Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 14:19:21 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > The simplest solution would be to rebuild UFC and DOLFIN whenever a > new version of SWIG is added in Debian. That's why i requested a > binNMU. Not sure if it would be possible to automate this in some way. > If dolfin only works wit

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-14 Thread Johannes Ring
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Johan Hake wrote: > On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg  wrote: >>> Does it work if you remove those checks in >>> >>>    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py >>>    dolfin/site-packag

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-14 Thread Johan Hake
On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote: Does it work if you remove those checks in dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py ? Yes, it works fine, but I also

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-14 Thread Johannes Ring
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > Does it work if you remove those checks in > >    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py >    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py > > ? Yes, it works fine, but I also had to remove the check in ufc_utils/bui

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Anders Logg
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > > Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler, > > or because it actually breaks (with some link error)? > > It is the version check that makes it break.

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Johannes Ring
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler, > or because it actually breaks (with some link error)? It is the version check that makes it break. This is the error message: OSError: PyDOLFIN was not compiled with t

Re: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

2012-06-13 Thread Anders Logg
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 09:33:36AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Jun  4, 2012 at 08:43:54 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >> > Johannes Ring (31/05/2012): > >> >> pytho