firebird4.0/3.0 testing migration status? (was: Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable)

2025-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
[ dropping -devel ] Hi, Am 26.01.25 um 18:19 schrieb Damyan Ivanov: -=| Rene Engelhard, 25.01.2025 22:05:51 +0100 |=- Changes:  firebird4.0 (4.0.5.3140.ds6-11) unstable; urgency=medium  .    * Upload to unstable Which now takes over firebird-dev. True. As intented. I just saw (passing

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.01.25 um 19:14 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 26.01.25 um 18:30 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [build CUT] dbaccess_firebird_test S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-25-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir &&  mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ && rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.01.25 um 19:14 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Tried in a clean sid VM. LibreOffice not rebuilt from clean sid, but as clean sid libfbclient2 4.0.5 is installed. (Expectedly) the same when creating a new db when just 3.0-server-core is present. The creation of a database and zthe

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.01.25 um 18:30 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [build CUT] dbaccess_firebird_test S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-25-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/workdir &&  mkdir -p $W/CppunitTest/ && rm -fr $W/CppunitTest/dbaccess_firebird_test.test.user &am

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
the future LO versions, no matter what future FB version they embed." And that apparently (not deep into it) needs libEngine12.so from -3.0-server-core (and now appantly -4.0-server-core, so probably libEngine13.so?) if build with 4.0s firebird-dev. Regards, Rene

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
release, 4.0 in Debian is co-installable with 3.0, so depending on firebird3.0-server-core and libfbclient2 from src:firebird4.0 should work. Nope. From LOs testsuite: [build CUT] dbaccess_hsql_binary_import S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-25-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$S/w

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 25.01.25 um 22:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:  firebird4.0 (4.0.5.3140.ds6-11) unstable; urgency=medium  .    * Upload to unstable Which now takes over firebird-dev. Which now means reverse-dependencies build against 4.0 firebird but do have Depends: libreoffice-core-nogui

Re: Accepted firebird4.0 4.0.5.3140.ds6-11 (source) into unstable

2025-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
e-depends like any other transition should have been done here... Regards, Rene

Bug#1094017: transition: poppler

2025-01-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
ition, ideally after the poppler upload so that we save one round of bin-NMUs and that source upload can be directly built against the new poppler :) Regards, Rene

Bug#1087818: Accepted coinmp 1.8.4+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable

2024-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 21.11.24 um 08:16 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [...] that the SONAME goes backwards whereas other distros don't have that (easily lookable by looking at them) e.g. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coin-or-CoinMP/blob/rawhide/f/coin-or-CoinMP.spec#_76 https://archlinux.org/packages/

Bug#1087818: Accepted coinmp 1.8.4+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable

2024-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 21.11.24 um 06:57 schrieb Pierre Gruet: Le 21/11/2024 à 00:18, Rene Engelhard a écrit : Hi, Am 20.11.24 um 22:25 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 20.11.24 um 17:19 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:  coinmp (1.8.4+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium  .    * Team upload    * Upload to unstable

Bug#1087818: Accepted coinmp 1.8.4+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable

2024-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 20.11.24 um 22:25 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 20.11.24 um 17:19 schrieb Debian FTP Masters:  coinmp (1.8.4+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium  .    * Team upload    * Upload to unstable to start the library transition Just that it is questionable whether one needed one at all as

Bug#1087818: Accepted coinmp 1.8.4+dfsg-2 (source) into unstable

2024-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
1.8.4. However they did that I wonder whether something is fishy here... That's why I didn't upload it (yet) to sid.. If you asked me I would have said that. Ah, well. Now we have that transition... Regards, Rene

Bug#1081553: transition: abseil

2024-10-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
build) Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#1073508: Bug#1074338: src:libxml2: fails to migrate to testing for too long: unresolved RC issue

2024-08-16 Thread Rene Engelhard
BI didn't change, aka all 64bit + i386) And I *think* you need Breaks/Conflicts in addition to Replaces at the new libxml2n. Regards, Rene

Bug#1078537: unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3

2024-08-11 Thread Rene Engelhard
armhf etc) and this was hinted in alreday for those. I hope I got the syntax right, no idea whether that is correct for tests in other packages affected by libreoffice. Adapt as needed, please :) force-badtest libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3/armel Regards, Rene

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.06.24 um 20:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Apologies if I'm missing something, but +    - recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 makes the package uninstallable on a default bookworm setup (i.e. Recommends are installed by APT). apt TTBOMK doesn't complain if a

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 17.06.24 um 19:05 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed On Sat, 2024-06-15 at 17:44 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-06-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.06.24 um 17:28 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2024-05-25 at 10:35 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: I'd like to fix 2 libreoffice bugs in stable. Most important is the SMB fix (which - for kf5 - also needs a kio stable update, but those can be do

Bug#1071826: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1+deb12u3

2024-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
;s subsumed in libmerged on 64bit archs anyway which we definitely + need to keep anyway (similar as libuuilo.so). +- recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5 + + -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 24 May 2024 21:06:45 +0200 + libreoffice (4:7.4.7-1+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=high * debian/

Re: Bug#1068609: libreoffice: FTBFS on arrmhf: testContentGnumeric assertion failed,- Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")

2024-04-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Version:  4:24.2.2-3 Hi, Am 07.04.24 um 23:13 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Filing a bug for reference. This is fixed in 4:24.2.2-3, will mark it as such when I get the bug number. As said. Regards, Rene

libreoffice: FTBFS on arrmhf: testContentGnumeric assertion failed,- Expression: xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")

2024-04-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
Source: libreoffice Version: 4:24.2.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: trixie ftbfs Hi, Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard: That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway

Re: liborcus / boost1.83 and time_t

2024-03-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard: That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway) So we probably missed a rename? (Or more for stuff silently using time-date?) boost1.83 (iostream)? liborcus? Both? I

liborcus / boost1.83 and time_t

2024-03-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway) So we probably missed a rename? (Or more for stuff silently using time-date?) boost1.83 (iostream)? liborcus? Both? Regards, Rene

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

2024-01-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
ange anything of that except that there were more machines which cannot build big stuff. Regards, Rene

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
later in the chain wait in NEW) Especially on armhf which is affected. Or will you do the source NMUs on armhf/i386? (For some packages where some features are disabled on 32bit this is probably not a good idea) Regards, Rene

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
fect it has been manually analyzed and determined to be unaffected. But libreoffice-dev-common not (on which libreoffice-dev depends) which contains all the arch-indep headers. Just libreoffice-dev contains one header diferent between archs. Regards, Rene

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
renames in unstable instead, leaving the package in experimental alone? How does that play together with the needed dpkg only in experimental? You can't build stuff for unstable involving experimental packages (except manually with binary upload, which would block testing migration) Regards, Rene

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Rene Engelhard
mental with the new binary package names in order to clear binary NEW, in coordination And what about skipped ones?  When will those be tried? What do you mean here by "skipped ones"? https://adrien.dcln.fr/misc/armhf-time_t/2023-12-18/results_skipped.txt (which incidentially contains

Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
updates like new upstream versions... Regards, Rene

Bug#1059535: transition: abseil

2023-12-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
s not LibreOffice but LibreOffice indirectly via pdfium (which makes chromium also be affected if it did build without using the embedded copy of abseil). That said libreoffice builds (both sids and experimentals version). Tested on amd64 only, but Regards, Rene

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 17.07.23 um 19:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 17.07.23 um 19:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Hi, With the FTBFS of mipsel/mip64el in sid we need to make a choice before the weekend:   - defer libreoffice update until 12.2, probably some time in the Autumn   - propogate 4

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-17 Thread Rene Engelhard
should do for mips64el, too Regards, Rene

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-07-12 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 12.07.23 um 23:01 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: Control: tag -1 confirmed [...] The version is fine. It may or may not make it into 12.1 depending on build times; we'll do our best. Uploaded, thanks. Regards, Rene

Bug#1028132: now ready

2023-06-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 27.06.23 um 00:15 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: On 2023-06-18 13:57:01 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: Hi, hunspell-dict-ko was fixed/worked around the issue (0.7.94-1) so we can do this now. As said it's a no-op for anything except r-cran-hunspell which also is prepared in experim

Bug#1028132: now ready

2023-06-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
d out how to best prevent this by adding a strict dependency there instead of hardcoding it... But even without that it's better to not have a copy of private headers in r-cran-hunspell. Can I upload to unstable? Regards, Rene

Bug#1036904: bookworm-pu: package libreoffice/4:7.4.7-1

2023-05-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
388 files changed, 8359 insertions(+), 4481 deletions(-) The whole diff is 17M, so I am not attaching it here. It is at https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/7.4/7.4.7.debdiff I know this is completely bending the rules, but so is #1035056, too If you wish I can make this also -0deb12u1, b

Bug#1035056: Disappointed

2023-05-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
son to deny that given this (imminent) approval of 50 source packages compared to one. All the other parameters are the same. Regards, Rene [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/7.4 [2] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/7.4.6/RC1#List_of_fixed_bugs h

Bug#1036766: unblock: libreoffice/4:7.4.5-3

2023-05-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
7.3.1-1s changelog +- fix typo in last upload (s/choosen/chosen/), thanks lintian + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 22 May 2023 18:00:45 +0200 + libreoffice (4:7.4.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium * fontconfig-2.14.1-no-RGB-stripes-layout-for-sub-pixel-rendering.diff: @@ -5,7 +19,7 @@ * debia

Bug#1033506: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6

2023-04-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 01.04.23 um 20:54 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sun, 2023-03-26 at 14:23 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: This fixes "CVE-2022-38745. Empty entry in Java class path risks arbitrary code execution" just disclosed by Apache OpenOffice. Please go ahead.

Bug#1033506: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6

2023-03-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/avoid-empty-java.class.path.diff: apply upstream patch +avoiding empty -Djava.class.path= (CVE-2022-38745) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:04:55 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.d

Bug#1028489: transition: boost1.81

2023-01-30 Thread Rene Engelhard
don't add the git version into the About box) Regards, Rene

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
[CCing hunspell-kos maintainer ] Hi, Am 08.01.23 um 19:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 07.01.23 um 16:45 schrieb Rene Engelhard: r-cran-hunspell included a copy of those internal headers and thus breaks when built against the newer ones. (And I assume will do so when built against the new ones against the old one.) See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug

Bug#1028132: transition: hunspell

2023-01-07 Thread Rene Engelhard
#136306 don't accept/suggest typos as 3-or-more-word compound words Prepare optional spelling mode of LibreOffice to not accept/suggest not dictionary-based words as compound words (#517) Merge in weblate translations --- snip --- Regards, Rene

Bug#1027298: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5

2022-12-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
+0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u5) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * debian/patches/hrk-euro-default.diff: default to EUR for .hr + + -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 27 Nov 2022 19:37:58 +0100 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u4) bullseye-security; urgency=high * debian/patches/ZDI-CAN

Bug#1016706: marked as done (transition: GNOME 43 mega libsoup3 transition)

2022-09-18 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, What you just quoted was just the e-d-s part. There's s still https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsoup3.html Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#1019724: warning: stray \ before - causes autopkgtest failure

2022-09-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
'll need more automation for the rest) Doesn't make sense imho, as neither has a bug and it's actually ucf in many cases doing the grep in question. Regards, Rene

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
nough that transitions will need to be fully coordinated, but having never maintained a library this popular before, I’m not sure what that point is. I'd say you reached this point already. Regards, Rene

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, (last mail for this topic for now, don't worry.) Am 28.08.22 um 21:19 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Quick testing with apt-get -b source (except of libreoffice, which I only did to after the place where abseil is actually used) complete, so they thankfully all should just be bin-NM

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was drop

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 19:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 19:50 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) is a uncoordinated transiition. libabsl20210324 -> libabsl20220623. # grep-dctrl -FDepends libabsl /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages -sPack

Re: uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 19:50 schrieb Rene Engelhard: b) is a uncoordinated transiition. libabsl20210324 -> libabsl20220623. # grep-dctrl -FDepends libabsl /var/lib/apt/lists/deb.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-amd64_Packages -sPackage and for source packages: # grep-dc

uncoordinated abseil transition ( was: Re: Accepted abseil 0~20220623.0-1 (source amd64) into unstable, unstable)

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
les Package: python3-ortools Package: telegram-desktop Package: ycmd Regards, Rene

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am 28.08.22 um 18:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: which contained a cut and paste error I introduced when redoing it after deciding I do the version check again for complenetess' sake... That doesn't work either. EDS_CHECK_VERSION is not available from only libebook, we'd need libed

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 28.08.22 um 18:37 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 28.08.22 um 17:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 28.08.22 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-08-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 16:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: This is now https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016420 (where the upstream bug which that one is marked as forwarded to has also the reasoning why support for < 3.16 was dropped which makes the patch bigger). I now di

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-08-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Sorry for this unneeded request. > (and, as you say, assume people will want to use newer versions in any case.) Indeed. Just didn't want to close myself, but we could do so and ignore this for buster. Regards, Rene

Bug#1016413: pu bug for reference

2022-08-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 04.08.22 um 12:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard: just for reference: a stable update for this is requested in http://bugs.debian.org/1016413 oops, should have been gone to #1016420 obviously (too hot...) Regards, Rene

Bug#1016413: pu bug for reference

2022-08-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
just for reference: a stable update for this is requested in http://bugs.debian.org/1016413

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 31.07.22 um 12:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [ Reason ] It seems the volution adress book is broken since 2015 due to a evolution change. Apparently noone noticed until 2021, where I backported the patch but then actually forgot to request a stable update [ Impact ] It stays broken

Bug#1016413: Acknowledgement (bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3)

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, oops, forgot the diff. Here it comes. (with s/UNRELEASED/stable/ of course before the upload.) Regards, Rene diff --git a/changelog b/changelog index 41633702..850dd234 100644 --- a/changelog +++ b/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

Bug#1016413: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
9d16eb68fd Regards, Rene

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-31 Thread Rene Engelhard
VE-2022-2630-6-7-add-infobar-to-prompt-to-refresh-t.patch: +fix CVE-2022-2630{5,6,7} + + -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:19:49 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high * backport fixes from libreoffice-7-0 branch: diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/patc

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.07.22 um 19:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard: actually this is quite a small update for a big package. Should we really do it (and the default change)? Or should we assume people don't use LO from oldstable anymore and either use bullseye or the bullseye version backported to buster? F

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 26.07.22 um 13:24 schrieb Rene Engelhard: [ Checklist ]    [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog    [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them    [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable    [ ] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable Update: [x] the

Bug#1016080: buster-pu: package libreoffice/:6.1.5-3+deb10u8

2022-07-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
_6.1.5-3+deb10u7.dsc libreoffice_6.1.5-3+deb10u8.dsc dpkg-source: Warnung: unsigniertes Quellpaket wird extrahiert (/home/rene/Debian/Pakete/LibreOffice/libreoffice/libreoffice_6.1.5-3+deb10u8.dsc) diff -Nru libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog libreoffice-6.1.5/debian/changelog --- libreoffice-6.

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u2 (was: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1)

2022-07-26 Thread Rene Engelhard
r.patch +debian/patches/0004-CVE-2022-2630-6-7-add-infobar-to-prompt-to-refresh-t.patch: +fix CVE-2022-2630{5,6,7} + + -- Rene Engelhard Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:19:49 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1) bullseye-security; urgency=high * backport fixes from libreoffice-7-0 branch

Bug#1016037: bullseye-pu: package libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4+deb11u1

2022-07-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
anges ] See above. I just added the verbatim upstream commits. Debdiff attached. [ Other info ] As said, for 2) we need a new update to switch the default later. Regards, Rene diff --git a/changelog b/changelog index bdd1d149..2baf8b2f 100644 --- a/changelog +++ b/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +libre

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-15 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 15.04.22 um 08:57 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 8:48 AM Rene Engelhard wrote: Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-14 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi again, Am 13.04.22 um 17:52 schrieb Rene Engelhard: Am 13.04.22 um 17:24 schrieb László Böszörményi (GCS): LibreOffice self-testing, especially its break iterator test fails for the Lao language. https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id

Bug#1007905: transition: icu

2022-04-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
. Otherwise everything was fine. But I think I might redo the rebuilds (only on amd64 now) to test everything with the final release of ICU. If that's not mandatory, I think ICU is quite OK for a transition soon. If python3-defaults was done (or actually even progressing...)... Regards, Rene

Re: Accepted nspr 2:4.32-2 (source) into unstable

2021-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
In this case one even can't argue with "assume good  faith" anymore since we already had that with nss back then and again you deliberately did this. Filed #1000299 for the bin-NMU a few hours ago. Regards, Rene

Bug#1000299: Accepted nspr 2:4.32-2 (source) into unstable

2021-11-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
ev (>= 2:4.32-2)' (and some debian-ports arch, does ANY work?) Regards, Rene

Bug#998339: nmu: xmlsec1_1.2.32-2

2021-11-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
utopkgtest/unstable/amd64/libr/libreoffice/16349711/log.gz Thankfully libxmlsec seems to write into that file what it detects at configure stage (in current sid nss.pc) and thus a bin-NMU should suffice. So please nmu xmlsec1_1.2.32-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against nss 3.72-1 to fix xmlsec1-nss.pc" Regards, Rene

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 14:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > Yes, it's slideshow. Transitions based on physics: Sorry, not transitions but animation effects in slideshows. Regards Rene

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am 05.09.21 um 14:37 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Hi, > > Am Sonntag, dem 05.09.2021 um 14:21 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: >> [...]But not for libreoffice, and libreoffice DOES use box2d since 7.1.x >> which is in testing. > > Sorry, I thought that was a copy&pa

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
something needs to be done. (And be it fixing box2d to stay  compatible. It's a separate project after all.) Yes, it's slideshow. Transitions based on physics: https://quwex.com/gsoc20-final-report/ And yes, I *do* follow the "don't use internal code copies" rule :) Regards, Rene

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 14:10 schrieb Markus Koschany: > Hello, > > Am Sonntag, dem 05.09.2021 um 09:48 +0200 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > [...] >> without any  coordination or a transition approved on debian-release. >> That a transition would be needed was viisble

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > caveexpress is the only other affected package - and (expectedly) > doesn't build anymore: > > [...] > > [20%] Building CXX object > src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o > cd > /

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 05.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Rene Engelhard: > nmu libreoffice . ANY . -m 'rebuild against libbox2d2' ] > > nmu libreoffice . ANY . experimental . -m 'changelog entry/dep-wait expr.' ] Sorry, cut and waste.. nmu libreoffice . ANY . -m 'rebuild against l

uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)

2021-09-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
't build anymore: [...] [20%] Building CXX object src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o cd /home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src/modules/physics && /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DHAVE_LUA_H -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/games\&

Bug#988906: unblock: libreoffice/1:7.0.4-4

2021-05-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
nfigured. Fix up + the symlink in postinst instead. (Closes: #985297) + + -- Rene Engelhard Sat, 01 May 2021 13:50:48 +0200 + libreoffice (1:7.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/tests/control.in: *really* add libreoffice-writer dependency diff -Nru libreoffice-7.0.4/debian/control l

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

2021-03-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 13.03.21 um 19:57 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 13:26 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> +libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7) buster; urgency=medium >> + >> + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream

Bug#984790: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u7

2021-03-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
=medium + + * debian/patches/fix-PYTHONPATH.diff: backport upstream fix to +not leave a bare trailing : in PYTHONPATH as it causes unconditional +loading of encodings.py from . (closes: #984703) + + -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:13:24 +0100 + libreoffice (1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6) buster

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 11:44:59AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes > pending. Will do a source upload. Done now. (And a new liborcus with bumped build-dep.) Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:36:26AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > @-release: please > > nmu libixion . ANY . -m 'rebuild with mdds >= 1.6.0 (closes: #964613)' Nevermind, I just remembered I have those "Debian Janitor" changes pending. Will do a source upload. Regards, Rene

Re: Bug#964613: liborcus: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j4 check VERBOSE=1 returned exit code 2

2020-09-13 Thread Rene Engelhard
us is built with x, rebuild ixion with x first" (at least for this specific mdds version) which ttbomk is not possible to express. On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 01:02:58PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > It *does* work though with liborcus 0.16.0 which I just uploaded to NEW, > so we probably sh

Bug#960046: transition: sane-backends

2020-05-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
mit/a11f5b7381097ea0ae9a3e03db909f4075628935 (2 years ago, when the last rename was attempted.) but this hasn't to be done immediately. So you either can bin-NMU it or not, it will pick the right library up on the next upload. regards, Rene

Bug#950918: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6

2020-03-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:18:34PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 11:06 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > #916846 was filed pre-buster but I have to admit I cheated against it > > being > > RC by merging the OpenGL transitions (it*s not a impo

Bug#950918: buster-pu: package libreoffice/1:6.1.5-3+deb10u6

2020-02-08 Thread Rene Engelhard
f attached. Regards, Rene -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CRAP Locale: LANG=de_

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
ilds dor the default. (With a shitload of hackery it is possible to build pyuno twice/thrice etc. but given there*s a LO part of it this will not be coinstallable, defeating the purpose.) Regards, Rene

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 4. Februar 2020 23:27:13 MEZ schrieb Simon McVittie : >On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner >... >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' > >This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
trospection which was accidentially kept disabled after a python3.8 test rebuild... * re-enable building of the "test packages" (-smoketest-data, -subsequentcheckbase) -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:29:19 + happened.) Regards, Rene

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:12:08PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 06:07:29PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > e.g. fontforge is still red in > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. > > > > >

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
ault.html is worked on. Didn't see it there so wanted to go sure. Regards, Rene

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 05:53:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On 17-01-2020 23:28, Matthias Klose wrote: > > >> Please add a transition tracker to switch the python3 default to 3.8. > >

Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-02 Thread Rene Engelhard
hink so. e.g. fontforge is still red in https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.8.html. That means that a rebuild of stuff using fontforge in the build will just FTBFS since it will be called with python3.8 and that has no module for 3.8 (yet). (Seen in a python-3.8-as-default testbuild for libreoffice some time ago.) Regards, Rene

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >