gnupg 1.2.5 vs. 1.4

2005-01-17 Thread Lance W. Haverkamp
at version 1.2.5 (stable, testing & unstable) for half a year? The PGP Global Directory (keyserver-beta.pgp.com) won't work with < 1.4 and s/mime compatibility in 1.9 isn't very far behind. -- Thanks! Lance W. Haverkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 719.495.9084 13520 New Disco

gnupg 1.2.5 vs. 1.4

2005-01-16 Thread Lance W. Haverkamp
version 1.2.5 (stable, testing & unstable) for half a year? The PGP Global Directory (keyserver-beta.pgp.com) won't work with < 1.4 and s/mime compatibility in 1.9 isn't very far behind. -- Thanks! Lance W. Haverkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 719.495.9084 13520 New Discovery Rd. Col

Re: Stable Release plan

2001-04-19 Thread lance
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Martin Schulze wrote: > lance wrote: > > Sorry - the difference between 1.2.1, 1.2.2 and 2.1r2, 2.2r3 escapes me - > > is the 'r' supposed to have special meaning ?? > > short for "revision" which has the meaning of minor version.

Re: Stable Release plan

2001-04-19 Thread lance
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:45:50PM +0100, lance wrote: > > All I am asking for is enough time to make a reasonable effort at making > > and shipping the version before the next version is released. If you want > > to have interi

Re: Stable Release plan

2001-04-19 Thread lance
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Martin Schulze wrote: > lance wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Martin Schulze wrote: > > > > > Considering how stable releaes were handled recently or better how > > > they weren't handled properly with regards to our duty to our users, &

Re: Stable Release plan

2001-04-18 Thread lance
3 months ?? Also - is there any chance that .iso images or pseudo image configurations could be ready _before_ the release is announced - eg tonight cdimage.debian.org still has no idea about 2.2r3 - shouldnt .isos be part of the release and the release be conditional upon them being done ?? Regards Lance

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

2000-11-22 Thread lance
at is the release' then you cant afford to upset people by having another release in a couple of weeks or by saying 'dont use that release', but you have to issue the fixes as updates to that release. Regards Lance

Re: Current 2.2r2 status

2000-11-22 Thread lance
point releases to allow for vendors pressing cd's - and I would suggest 3 months as being the absolute minimum. The real problem here seems to have come about because 2.2r1 was released prematurely without the then known security fixes having been incorporated . Regards Lance [EMAIL PROTECTED]