On 09/06/2018 22:29, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 20:12 +0200, Sylvain wrote:
>> On 08/06/2018 19:55, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2018-06-06 at 19:54 +0200, b...@debian.org wrote:
Please consider this update to freedink-dfarc for st
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: stretch
Severity: normal
Hi,
Please consider this update to freedink-dfarc for stretch.
It fixes a security issue that can overwrite arbitrary user files.
Sending to stable following security team's direct
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package freedink
It fixes the 'symlink_to_dir' from the previous upload, which was
incomplete (i.e. not done in all cases for the -dbg package).
diff -Nru freedink-108.4+d
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cytadela
It fixes binary-indep-only builds that the previous upload broke.
Also it better implements the symlink_to_dir migration.
diff -Nru cytadela-1.1.0/debian/
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package freedink
The upload applies a fix from upstream for a segfault due to an
off-by-one overflow. The latest rebuild makes the game segfault on
savegame reload, making t
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package cytadela.
As other game packages such as tworld, the current packaging breaks
binNMU due to /usr/share/doc symlink from the main cytadela "arch"
package to the second
Control: reopen -1
> don't complain about the communication style of the release team
> when they have to cope with hundreds of inquiries
Let's reopen the bug and discuss this after the freeze period, you're
not in a situation to accept comments AFAICS.
- Sylvain
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:29:3
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 09:29:28AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2015-02-16 9:20, b...@debian.org wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:46:11AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >>If you want more changes to be considered, don't they need to be
> >>uploaded first? In that case, now is quite
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:46:11AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM:
> > You got it all wrong.
>
> So other than the typo s/font/fusion/, I don't really understand that
> statement. There were two unstable fusionforge uploads post-freeze
> that were in fact acc
Hi,
You got it all wrong.
I wrote:
> So, I take it we need to maintain a branch off the upstream stable
> branch, that will not include most user-related bugfixes (but include
> the piupart-related nitpicks ;))?
Short of an answer from you, that's exactly what happened, and Jessie
has a sub-par
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package fusionforge which fixes RC #772870.
Interdiff:
diff -u fusionforge-5.3.2+20141104/debian/changelog
fusionforge-5.3.2+20141104/debian/changelog
--- fusionforge-5.3.2+
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package fusionforge which fixes RC #771619.
Attached:
- debdiff
- diff
fusionforge (5.3.2+20141104-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Start Debian-specific branch without impo
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 11:03:59PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 06:52:26PM +0100, b...@debian.org wrote:
> > We're (upstream-ly) maintaining a stable branch for FusionForge,
> > called "5.3", which the Debian package currently follows.
> > (incidentally Lolando an
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
We're (upstream-ly) maintaining a stable branch for FusionForge,
called "5.3", which the Debian package currently follows.
(incidentally Lolando and I are both upstream and debian devs)
We're currently
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package fusionforge,
The new upload follows the upstream stable branch which only contain
bugfixes, notably 4 RC #767931, #754791, #767688, #767683.
Attached:
- debdiff
- di
15 matches
Mail list logo
