Hi, On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:46:11AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 8:24 AM: > > You got it all wrong. > > So other than the typo s/font/fusion/, I don't really understand that > statement. There were two unstable fusionforge uploads post-freeze > that were in fact accepted into testing [0], and there are no other > proposed changes currently to review, so I'm not sure what you're > asking for.
I asked: > It makes sense that users benefit from the quality of this branch, > so we'd like to know to what extent following this [stable] branch > is compatible with the Freeze. Bottom line: we wanted to include stable bugfixes. Given that we: - were given a RTFM (which says "no bugfix"), - had to wait 2 months and a half to get another follow-up, we had to not include the bugfixes, but a special Debian branch that only fixes a couple "serious" nitpicks from piuparts. Additionally, in the case of submitting e.g. 5.3.3 and getting the transition to freeze rejected, it would be quite a hassle to revert to 5.3.2 or switch to proposed-updates, hence why we asked here beforehand. So saying: > If you want more changes to be considered, don't they need to be > uploaded first? In that case, now is quite late. is a bit easy, I believe we made the effort to contact you as mentioned in your FAQ. Don't blame us :/ -- Sylvain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150216092003.ga2...@mail.beuc.net
