Hi all,
I like the idea of having a volatile archive and I agree with
almost all what Dominik wrote about the motivation.
I would, however, completely separate it from backports. I.e.
- separate NEW queue
- different suffix
- no need to keep a volatile package out of testing
Why?
- volatil
Quoting Uwe Kleine-König :
If the concerns are mostly about the hardware not being rackable, there
is a rackable NAS by Netgear:
https://www.netgear.com/business/products/storage/readynas/RN2120.aspx#tab-techspecs
This seems to be out of stock and discontinued, unfortunately.
Anyway,
in "
-#~ "/etc/webmin/miniserv.conf definiert."
-
-#~ msgid ""
-#~ "https://localhost:1\";>webmin at "
-#~ "https://hostname:1"
-#~ msgstr ""
-#~ "https://localhost:10000\";>webmin unter "
-#~ "https://hostna
Dears,
I think the right way to get missing items or corrections into the release
notes is by filing a proper bug report against package "release-notes".
That way it will not be forgotten which can easily happen with an email on
the wrong mailing list. (The right one would be debian-doc, I belie
+
+ * Fix CVE-2015-9059 (Closes: #863671).
+ * Add myself to Uploaders.
+ * Add Vcs fields.
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:21:14 +
+
picocom (1.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. Closes: #659590.
diff -Nru picocom-1.7/debian/control picocom-1.7/debian
. Martin Borgert Fri, 26 May 2017 22:35:49 +
+
gajim (0.16.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (closes: #839780)
diff -Nru gajim-0.16.6/debian/patches/fix-xep-0146-opt-in
gajim-0.16.6/debian/patches/fix-xep-0146-opt-in
--- gajim-0.16.6/debian/patches/fix-xep-0146-opt-in
ring tests
+(Closes: #857707).
+ * Mark python-sorl-thumbnail-doc as Multi-Arch: foreign.
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Wed, 26 Apr 2017 22:10:48 +
+
sorl-thumbnail (12.3+git20160928-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream git snapshot (Closes: #834678).
diff -Nru sorl-thumbnail-12.3+g
(Closes: #849728)
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:45:44 +
+
python-pyftpdlib (1.5.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Set TRAVIS=1 to skip one unit test, marked by upstream as
diff -Nru python-pyftpdlib-1.5.1/debian/control
python-pyftpdlib-1.5.1/debian/control
--- python
compliance (correct EME element)
+ * Add patch to hide lock icon, when OMEMO encryption is disabled
+ * Add patch to not handle "normal" messages, prevents crash
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Sat, 08 Apr 2017 23:09:34 +
+
gajim-omemo (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstre
ocial
+engineering attacks. (Closes: #854739)
+ * Use ssl.get_protocol_name() to find out which TLS version is
+in use (allows the latest TLS versions to be used as well as any future
+versions). (Closes: #851900)
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:04:06 +
+
sleekxmpp (1.
Hi,
there is a security bug open (#854739) and I'll try to port a
simple patch from slixmpp. (Or, if does not work, just remove
the affected functionality - better no carbons than "dangerous"
ones.)
But the package will be removed from testing by overmorrow. What
do I have to do so that sleekxmpp
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Uploaded to proposed-updates->stable-new.
have WOT installed by other
+means than as Debian package.
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:25:45 +
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index b1c9a53..c6c1b15 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+wot (20131118-2) jessie; urgency
This package is an empty, transitional package to remove
+WOT safely from your computer.
+Make sure, that users don't have WOT installed by other
+means than as Debian package.
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:25:45 +
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/ch
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I like to upload wot without any content. wot has been identified as
spyware/malware. Instead of just removing the package and leaving our
unsuspecting users with the malware,
Hi,
it would be nice to get OCE 0.17 into stretch at some point.
Would it make sense to upload this version to experimental and
check/fix build problems esp. on arm64, mips, and ppc64el?
I built 0.17 (source package from Ubuntu) and compiled freecad
0.16 (again .dsc from Ubuntu) against it on am
Python 3 support for Jessie (Closes: #775609).
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:33:19 +
+
python-exif (1.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #763347), new upstream homepage
diff -Nru python-exif-1.4.2/debian/control python-exif-1.4.2/debian/control
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+trac-subcomponents (1.2.0+hga86f0413121f-4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix UnicodeError exception in Trac query (Closes: #774424).
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Sat, 03 Jan 2015 00:22:41 +
+
trac-subcomponents (1.2.0+hga86f0413121f-3) unstable; urgency=low
[minor cleanups
2014-11-26 00:03:49.0 +0100
+++ trac-1.0.2+dfsg/debian/changelog2014-12-03 13:25:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+trac (1.0.2+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * apply upstream patch to fix syntax highlighting (Closes: #771799)
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Wed, 03 Dec 2014 12:00:13
bian/watch
+(Closes: #769833)
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert Tue, 25 Nov 2014 23:02:26 +
+
trac (1.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream (Closes: #766681).
diff -Nru trac-1.0.2/debian/copyright trac-1.0.2+dfsg/debian/copyright
--- trac-1.0.2/debian/copyright 2014-10-25 01:16:39.0 +020
fsg/debian/changelog 2014-11-23
21:49:32.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+python-mpld3 (0.3git+20140910dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Added the missing link(s) to d3.js (Closes: #770759)
+ * Added dh-python build-dep
+ * Standards-Version is now 3.9.6, no changes.
+
+ -- W. Martin Borgert S
Hi Julien, hi László,
On 2014-11-14 12:03, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 07:15:57 +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock D3, which fi
Hi,
I'm using the Trac 0.12.5-3 package in production and can
confirm, that it is in a good state. The upgrade from wheezys
0.12.3-1 was completely transparent.
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
On 2012-10-08 18:36, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> I will try to extract the actual source code changes, so the diff will be
> much shorter.
Hi Mehdi, hi release team,
I have here the diff between 0.12.3-1 (testing) and 0.12.4-1
(experimental). I reduced the diff to actual code changes,
Quoting "Mehdi Dogguy" :
I'm not sure. When big, you may gzip it or upload it to somewhere public.
Thanks, will do next time.
80 files changed, 830 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-)
I will try to extract the actual source code changes, so the diff will be
much shorter. Anyway, I appreciate i
On 2012-10-01 23:19, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> We recently discussed the status of Trac for wheezy [0] and would like
> to try to get Trac 0.12.4 into wheezy (it currently has 0.12.3-1).
I fully support this with testing, reviewing, uploading...
Whatever is necessary.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2009-04-16 00:53, Simon Paillard wrote:
> Some remarks:
* I couldn't build the PDF with dblatex and changed 'be' to xmlroff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-04-15 00:34, Hleb Rubanau wrote:
> Sorry for bothering you directly, but it seems you are the person
> who can help to understand what can be done with Belarusian
> translation of lenny release notes.
Hi, unfortunately, I'm currently very busy (non-Debian stuff),
so that I could not do a
On 2009-03-22 20:26, Luk Claes wrote:
> @jens+debacle: Can you please try to have the Release Notes as
> up-to-date as possible, TIA?
These days are busy for me. Any help very much appreciated!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On 2009-03-21 07:44, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Martin, I think the proposed schedule is OK.
It's now published here:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases/5.0.1#ReleaseNotesSchedule
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 2009-02-21 11:57, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >>> I propose the following deadlines:
> >>>
> >>> 2009-03-22 23:59 UTC (Greenwich!) English string freeze
> >>> 2009-03-29 23:59 UTC (GMT!) translation freeze
...
>
On 2009-02-16 15:44, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> The idea was to leave them out of *testing*, not immediately dropping them
> from the archive.
+1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-02-13 10:49, Praveen A wrote:
> Can you build the release-notes using ttf-malayalam-fonts in lenny? It
> just has defoma dependency. The fonts packaged in etch have some
> rendering problems and pdf created with fonts in etch is bad.
www.debian.org runs etch with selected packages from
bac
(Sorry, one mail lost in fight against my webmail app.)
Quoting "Jens Seidel" :
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:25:48AM -0800, Praveen A wrote:
2009/2/12 W. Martin Borgert :
Can someone tell me when are where was the 90% cut-off decided? I
might have missed something.
It's absol
Quoting "Praveen A" :
I remember 12 as the deadline for english (though we froze before
that) and 14 for translations. It would be a complete disappointment
not have ml since we moved to 73 from 0.
No, English was Monday. 14 is the date of the actual release, I hope!
In between there is the tim
On 2009-02-13 08:14, Miroslav Kure wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 01:27:18AM +0000, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > * cs: looks like 76%, but probably it's much better (bad
> > statistics at non-po)
>
> The translation is fully up to date, the only missing thing is last
On 2009-02-13 01:27, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Release team: Please decide what to do with unfinished
> translations (< 90%) and some build problems:
As I didn't get any reply so far, I did the following:
> * cs: looks like 76%, but probably it's much better (bad
&g
Hi,
it's (a little bit after) Thursday, 2009-02-12 23:59 UTC, so by
definition, the release notes are now translated.
Many thanks to all translators, it was and still is a great
pleasure to work in such a vibrant community!
Release team: Please decide what to do with unfinished
translations (< 9
On 2009-02-12 23:02, Nicolas François wrote:
> That's not something that should be changed now, but after Lenny is
> released, you should try
...
That sounds awesome. I'll try that after release. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsu
Hi,
the plan still is to have the translations ready until Thursday,
2009-02-12 23:59 UTC, which is in about three hours. Every later
fix should be coordinated with debian-release@lists.debian.org,
because we don't want to break the build right now.
Most translations are already in good shape. Th
On 2009-02-12 16:37, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> The manual runs did make me much more happier:
Good!
> an shortly afterwards started second run did take 45 minutes. It's still
> quite some time, but it does for the moment eliminate the overlapping of
> often runs. Further optimization though would
On 2009-02-12 10:00, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> I will give it a manual run and see how long it takes. Hopefully we can
> call the case closed then and I can reactivate the automatic build in
> the often run again.
Maybe you could do two things:
- measure "make pdf LINGUA=en architecture=armel"
a
On 2009-02-12 08:13, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> >Now I
> >discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it
> >"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached
> >for review.
>
On 2009-02-11 23:37, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
>Now I
>discovered, that there is a bug in dblatex: In one case it
>"forgets" to pass the options to xsltproc. Patch attached
>for review.
How would we get the patch onto the system? Via backports?
--
To UNSUBS
[Note: I filed #514932 about the issue.]
On 2009-02-11 08:22, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Alright, this is getting ridiculous. Did anyone actually try the build
> on an etch system before it was dumped on us? What times did it take? It
> is now building since over 8 hours and still not finished.
...
On 2009-02-11 16:43, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
> Should squeeze be referred to as 6.0 already?
> Wouldn't that be decided later?
That has been announced by Adeodato Simó on 2009-01-28. It's a
good idea to decide both release (number) and code name one
release ahead for stuff like release notes, right
On 2009-02-10 22:54, J S Bygott wrote:
> 4.1.1.2 Check grub's kernel installation hooks
> If you use GRUB as bootloader and previously upgraded to etch from an older
> release of debian, please verify that the hooks in /etc/kernel-img.conf have
> been updated from /sbin/update-grub to /usr/sbin/upd
On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> What about:
>
> ... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages
> (build from over 12,000 source packages).
Perfect!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On 2009-02-10 11:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
> > search and replace in the release notes.
>
> I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Gr
On 2009-02-10 18:50, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Yes the 23'000 are the binary packages for i386. Oh, I better correct that
> to 22'000 to reflect other archs, too.
>
> I took the number of binary packages, because we usually take the number of
> binary packages. It was in the last announc
Hi,
on http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/statistics.html you
can find the state of the 5.0/lenny release notes translations.
It looks very good, i.e. it's more 00ff00 than ff. Some
translations seem to lag a little bit, however.
Thanks for your attention!
P.S. Do not forget to run
Zitat von "Julien Cristau" :
I don't think recommending its use in the release notes for
etch->lenny is a good idea at all.
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes. (Not globally, there
are some cases, where this is not possible. At som
Zitat von "Steve Langasek" :
This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
I've seen over the past year, that isn't aptitude.
Zitat von "Alexander Reichle-Schmehl" :
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
- Emdebian
- Blu-ray
- SELinux
- OpenVZ
- Netbooks/EEE PC
One sentence each, written by a nati
Hi,
since twenty minutes, as planned, the Debian release notes are
"string-frozen". I ask everyone to do any changes in the English
text only in collaboration with the translators. Thanks!
Translators: If nobody objects I ask you to finish translations
until Thursday, 2009-02-12 23:59 UTC. Not mu
Hi,
if nobody objects, we will freeze the English version of the
release notes in about four hours, at Sunday, 2009-02-08 23:59
UTC. After that time, any major change would make our
translators very angry! We don't want that. (Minor changes,
like fixing broken English can be coordinated, however.
On 2009-02-08 17:33, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> Something like this:
Added.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-02-08 00:07, Luk Claes wrote:
> I think it's best to delay that to r1. Can someone please provide a text
> for the release notes to describe the problem, TIA?
Hi all: Please send me a paragraph of text ASAP.
(Or file a bug with the proposed text against "release-notes".)
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Quoting Christoph Berg :
> I'd like to push forward the idea of putting a formal dedication text
> for Lenny on our mirrors, along with signatures.
Shall the dedication text appear in the release notes? If so, please
ping debian-...@l.d.o (or me) after fixing the English contents
(2009-02-06 in yo
Hi,
I like to ask for opinions/help/contribution regarding the lenny
release notes:
0. credits
1. too many bug reports open, missing tests, deadlines
2. hyphenation with dblatex
3. size of PDFs with xmlroff on etch
4. compilation time with dblatex on etch
0. Credits
I added some author and t
On 2009-02-02 00:19, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> you forgot debian-l...@lists.debian.org. remember that producing final
> live images requires:
Can somebody update/correct the Debian live paragraph in the
release notes, please? See #493931. Currently it says:
Debian Live-CD
TODO: What's the state?
Here we go:
da: 0 translated messages, 751 untranslated messages.
de: 595 translated messages, 16 fuzzy translations, 140 untranslated messages.
es: 574 translated messages, 98 fuzzy translations, 79 untranslated messages.
fi: 1 translated message, 750 untranslated messages.
fr: 691 translated mes
Hello world,
sorry for repeating myself: It's high time to translate the
release notes. The current statistics doesn't look good:
da: 0 translated messages, 650 untranslated messages.
de: 552 translated messages, 41 fuzzy translations, 147 untranslated messages.
es: 0 translated messages, 734 unt
Hi, the latest version of debian-refcard (pure documentation
package) fixes a missing build dependency (FTBFS), a minor
correction in the French translation, and adds a new zh_TW
translation. There are no other changes. Please let it go into
Lenny in time. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On 2009-01-23 10:17, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:11:00AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> > Btw., will squeeze be 6.0?
>
> Unknown yet, and probably won't be for some time.
It would be cool, if we could define that (like the release
name) one release ah
On 2009-01-22 12:46, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> The "Deprecated [server] packages" packages section in the release notes
> is unchanged from etch. Is there a list anywhere of major server
> packages that will be released with lenny but which are already
> scheduled for removal for squeeze? The only
Quoting Noah Meyerhans :
> I've got some minor typo fixes and things that I'd like to add to the
> release notes. Where can I find the source to
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/i386/release-notes/index.en.html
> so I can create patches? Is it OK to commit directly to the repository,
> or
Hi release managers, hi everybody else,
suppose we would freeze the English original of the release notes by
2009-01-23 23:59 GMT (Friday night). How much time would be left for
translators?
TIA.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
Hello world,
On 2009-01-18 18:33, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Given that D-I release is very near now, I think that a call for
> translation updates should be sent ASAP...
Yes! We can hope for the Debian 5.0 ("lenny") release
approaching really soon now. So please, check the translation
status of
Hi, the debian-refcard (pure documentation package) contains new
and updated translations. It is 10 days in unstable now. Please
let it go into Lenny. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
sooner or later we will release Debian 5.0. When time comes.
The release notes are far from being ready, but we need to start
translations now. If you like to help:
1. Please reply to this e-mail (debian-doc list) stating your
interest. I will coordinate translations to prevent double
Hi, the debian-refcard (pure documentation package) contains new
and updated translations. It is 13 days in unstable now. Please
let it go into Lenny. Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2008-09-02 23:06, Luis Matos wrote:
> Ter, 2008-09-02 às 07:59 +0200, Luk Claes escreveu:
> > Luis Matos wrote:
> > > Upstream states: "Trac 0.11.1 contains a number of bug fixes and minor
> > > enhancements."
> >
> > Too much to review for too little gain, not unblocked.
Release team and Luk:
73 matches
Mail list logo
