On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> For the generation of the Official Debian CD images the following things are
> of CRITICAL IMPORTANCE:
>
> 1) Install slink-proposed-updates/w3-el* in the main slink archive
>
> 2) Install anything waiting on security.debian.org (latest is mtr_0.28-
ux which is a free distribution of the GNU/Linux operating system,
and the development of the Debian GNU/Hurd operating system.
>> Contact Information
For further information, please send email to the Debian Press Team
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or visit the Debian homepage at <http://www.debian.org/>.
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the current stable release manager
for The Debian Project.
On 3 Mar 2000, James Troup wrote:
> (o) There is no nmh in proposed-updates, Wichert... (except he's not
> here; anyone care about this?)
It's in ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/dists/slink/updates/.
All the sources and .deb files are there, but I can't find the .changes
file, so
of the GNU/Linux operating system,
and the development of the Debian GNU/Hurd operating system.
>> Contact Information
For further information, please send email to the Debian Press Team
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or visit the Debian homepage at <http://www.debian.org/>.
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the current stable release manager
for The Debian Project.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2000, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The stable release of Debian which is distributed in CDs does not have a
> working TeX (!).
>
> This is fixed in tetex-bin_0.9.981113-3, uploaded nearly three months ago,
> but unfortunately this is still in the proposed-updates directory.
>
> Are the
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Vincent Renardias wrote:
>
> > unless anyone has objections, my package list for 2.1r5 is definitive...
> >
> > pkg list: http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
>
> There are still a few ($ARCH M
ation
For further information, please send email to the Debian Press Team
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or visit the Debian homepage at <http://www.debian.org/>.
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is the current stable release manager
for The Debian Project.
here are files in proposed-updates that indeed look like m68k install
floppies, but I haven't included them on my list because I haven't found
the .changes that's supposed to come with them (hence I can't tell who
uploaded them or what it's supposed to fix). Any pointer
mpile 1.0.1.0-3.2 ?
1.0.1.0-3.2 is okay.
List updated for the other packages.
> > [Vincent 1999/12/18]
> > package : gs
> > version : 5.10-3.99.slink.0
> > architectures: i386 sparc (ALPHA, M68K MISSING)
> > issue: package used /usr/share/doc
>
&g
lease 2.1r5 asis?
The complete list is attached, as well as the release notes. The master
version is available at http://www.debian.org/~vincent/2.1r5.txt
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU
Ok,
besides the missing of many non-i386 packages that I can't recompile
myself, the list is now stable and I have a proposed release notes
document. What should I do? wait a bit more for the missing packages or
release anyway?
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROT
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 23, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Huh? what in mutt-1.0.0 makes it improper for use in slink?
> If you compile it on slink it will install the documentation part in
> /usr/doc, part in /usr/sh
nlog (date received from ISDN line wasn't
> >interpreted correctly).
>
> This doesn't run on m68k anyway (is state Not-For-Us; forget it).
ok.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],
00-01-10 05:18 usr/share/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2000-01-10 05:18 etc/
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2000-01-10 05:18 etc/rc.boot/
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 168 2000-01-10 05:18 etc/rc.boot/adjtimex
$
which version of adjtimex are you talking about?
Cordialement,
--
- V
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Vincent Renardias wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > [Vincent 2000/01/18]
&g
On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 21, Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [Vincent 2000/01/18]
> > package : mutt
> > version : 1.0.0-3.1
> > architectures: i386 (ALPHA, SPARC & M68K MISSING)
>
rdialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org http://www
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Joey Hess wrote:
> Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > package : slrn
> > version : 0.9.5.7-15.99
> > architectures: i386 m68k (ALPHA, SPARC MISSING)
> > issue: versions older than 0.9.5.4 are not y2k-compliant.
>
>
libwww-perl (#54202)
I'd appreciate very much if someone could help here and provide
a patch or fixed package for those.
- recompile the packages for alpha, sparc & m68k (although some packages
already have been recompiled for m68k)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincen
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > Security updates:
>
> package : lpr
> version : 0.48-0.slink1
> architectures: alpha i386 m68k sparc
> issue: remote exploit
not yet in dists/proposed-updates (but
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>
> > Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > > [Vincent 1999/12/20]
> > > package : lprng
> > > version : 3.5.2-2.1
> > > architectures:
hello,
Here's my updated list of packages that should go in 2.1r5 (still
uncomplete; I miss y2k fixes for tetex-extra, cbb, xinetd and
http-analyze.
I plan to NMU them on tuesday and then produce the non-i386 packages.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there still no fix for them on monday, I'll consider NMUing...
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org
sts/proposed-updates (we still miss
quite a few), plus a few days to recompile on non-i386...
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux:
ectly) to make sure all the relevant entries are included.
>
> Does that mean I have to release a new version with another corrected
> changelog entry, to get it installed into stable?
No. the current one is fine.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTE
time to recompile a dozain
of packages.
To avoid this problems in the future, I'd like to be able to recompile
non-i386 packages myself.
I'm just missing accounts on alpha & m68k machines running slink. (I can
use my account on xia02 for sparc)
Cordialement,
--
Argh... I forgot to add an entry to the list:
package : elm-me+
version : 2.4pl25ME+65-0
architectures: alpha i386 (M68K & SPARC missing)
vulnerability: y2k problem (date sorting)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhard
ow
produced by the samba source package. Should we rebuild the whole samba
package?
Attached: the corrected version of the list, and the changes I
made. (shouldn't we be using CVS for this anyway?)
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{de
' would be nice..
>
> I agree...
So do I, but the problem is that in most cases the changelog only says
"fix y2k problem" or even "this version is now y2k OK" with no more
details...
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pi
ystem it is executed.
Is the bug still there in 4.2-6? If not, I'd like to avoid to introduce a
new package now if possible... If it's just a better fix, it doesn't look
that critical (plus, I don't think the syntax of touch changed recently).
Cordialement,
--
- Vincen
: trn
version : 3.6-9.3.2
architectures: m68k (other not applicable)
problem : sync with other archs.
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux:
slink.1_i386.deb
> -rw-rw-r-- 1 apharris users 50638 Dec 7 23:20
> telnet_0.12-4slink.1_i386.deb
Yes.
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.de
NB: I have a package that is puked up by dinstall with the following
message:
$ ~maor/dinstall/dinstall -n gnats_3.113-0slink1_i386.changes
gnats_3.113-0slink1_i386.changes
SKIP (too new)
Rejected:
gnats_3.113-0slink1_i386.changes: Unknown Format `'
$
Does anyone have an idea?
--
- Vi
ild the 2.1.11 boot-floppies, I can do
> definately do it, in fact, I might be the best to do it.
Offer accepted.
Did you find a slink machine usable for this compilation BTW?
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.or
swer so far).
Another thing: the current emacs20 is both slink/potato is *not* y2k
clean (See #43249) and I have no fix so far.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux:
ut there for 2 weeks now).
Paul Slootman has recompiled all the y2k fixes on alpha. You can find the
files in master:~vincent/INCOMING. AFAIK, there's nobody else who's
working on the non-i386 updates.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openh
On Thu, 25 Nov 1999, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > 2 packages where missing in the list I posted yesterday:
>
> More missing stuff: roxen and pike for m68k and sparc.
I've updated my list:
changes since last posting:
- updated alpha
2 packages where missing in the list I posted yesterday:
---
[*] smartlist_3.13-2
- y2k fix.
[MISSING: alpha]
[*] gnats_3.113-0slink1
- y2k fix
[MISSING: alpha, sparc, m68k]
---
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware
k, alpha, sparc]
--
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org http://www.g
-half" later featuring a more
extensive update (At least: 2.2 based, XFree 3.3.5, October GNOME)
Cordialement,
NB: I currently looking for:
1/ testers for the y2k-fixed packages (see www.debian.org/~vincent/)
2/ non-i386 people to recompile for m68k, sparc, alpha.
Cordialement
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Christian Meder wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 03:26:37PM +0000, Vincent Renardias wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > > I agree -- it's fine to upgrade to kernel 2.2.x in slink, but
> > > upgra
potato out.
indeed; but OTOH, if we don't upgrade enough packages, it's not worth the
trouble ;).
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.orgExecutive
from pre2 to pre3).
2.1r3 is just a fix updating what's broken in 2.1.
The stable update (Note: 'update' != 'fix') will include the kernel 2.2 by
default.
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
-
ith 2.1r3 < x < 2.2.
any suggestions besides x = 2.1.1?
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.orgExecutive Linux: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org Open Hardware
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> Vincent Renardias wrote:
> > kernel:
> > upgrade to 2.2.11 (many new/updated drivers, security fixes, no
> > known problem yet)
> > For europeans, we may want to include the next 2.2.12 release
> > since
, the migration from 2.0 to 2.2 has not be a
major problem for the other Linux distributions, so I'm not too worry
about this...
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhar
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> > >Everyone I've talked to it
> > >seems in favor of it and I have the support of the stable relese manager,
> > >Vincent Renardias.
> >
> > Oh, excellent, Vincent was announced. Cool.
>
> Let's s
ent,
still sparcless...
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: http://www.openhardware.orgExecutive Linux: -
- http://www.fr.debian.org Open Hardware:
48 matches
Mail list logo
