On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2000 at 01:37:29AM +0000, Philip Hands wrote:
> > 1) we fix it without changing the _r4
> >
> > 2) we fix it and go to _r5 for m68k only
> >
> > 3) we fix it and move to _r5 for everything
> >
> > 4) I fix it on the UK mirror, and the ``official'' CDs are produced from
> > something other than the official stable archive.
> >
> > 5) We forget about it, and fail to produce CDs, like we did last time
> > for both m68k & sparc.
>
> I think 3) is the best option. It's time for a 2.1r5 anyway, with the
> y2k fixes we've found. Vincent says it will be released "soon", which
> I take to mean about a week. Vincent, can you give details?
About 1 week to get all the fixes in dists/proposed-updates (we still miss
quite a few), plus a few days to recompile on non-i386...
Cordialement,
--
- Vincent RENARDIAS [EMAIL PROTECTED],pipo}.com,{debian,openhardware}.org} -
- Debian/GNU Linux: GNOME : -
- http://www.fr.debian.org http://www.gnome.org -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Every man has two nations, and one of them is France" [Benjamin Franklin]
