Hi,
2014/1/21 intrigeri :
> Hi,
>
> Teodor, ping?
I don't have the necessary experience to make this source debdiff.
Thomas, are you still interested in uploading this (simple) patch for
squeeze?
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
2012/5/8 Adam D. Barratt :
> I'll add looking at this to my to-do list.
>
> In any case, the window for getting fixes into the upcoming point release
> closed a couple of days ago, so the package won't get approved (or
> otherwise) until the point release has happened (scheduled for the coming
> we
2012/5/8 Cyril Brulebois :
> As far as I'm concerned, I can't judge the impact of that PHP thingy.
> [..]
> So, unless somebody feels fancy and wants to take it from here, that's
> a “no” for me.
I don't think this decision should be based on feelings, but rather on
technical analyse of the patch.
2012/5/8 Thomas Goirand :
> Yes. As I wrote, this was fixed upstream, and the diff is only a
> backport of upstream fix for the issue which I believe Teodor did (I'm
> not sure who's the author, but it looked correct to me).
I'm the author of the patch. I tried to find how it was fixed in
testing/
Hi Debian Release team,
The reported problem here appears to be for amd64 only because I was
able to install the package libswt-gtk-3-java on i386. Also, looking
at the build status page [1] I see that the amd64 package was uploaded
directly by the maintainer.
Is there any chance that scheduling
Hi,
2011/1/27 Philipp Kern :
> possibly. The only value I see in this is the transparent "we upgrade to the
> next stable version when it's released" way of upgrading.[1] Apart from that
> we're not entirely unhappy with only using codenames instead of suite
> aliases.
Of course, I only use cod
2011/1/24 Neil McGovern :
> By the looks of things, Mehdi has already replied to your bug saying
> that we can't accept the package at this stage.
Yes, I know. But I thought that it could also be a good candidate for
a "second thought" as it has been for other packages too. I mean, the
package is
2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy :
> On 01/03/2011 11:31 AM, Teodor wrote:
>>
>> Please unblock package mercurial-server. The two RC bugs for this
>> package were fixed so it should get back for inclussion in Debian 6.0
>> (squeeze).
>>
>
> I think it's too late to get it back in Squeeze.
I guess this would
Hi,
2011/1/3 Mehdi Dogguy :
>
> I think it's too late to get it back in Squeeze.
What would be the risk of including this package with no release
critical bugs into 6.0? There are packages with RC bugs that are
ignored and still allowed to be released with 6.0, but a package with
no RC bugs is no
Hi,
Just a note, iceweasel's migration is blocked by sqlite3 [1]. I've
seen this today on my systems where the packages where kept back on a
dist-upgrade (manually added a PIN for the version in unstable until
the release).
So, this probably means an unblock for sqlite3 or a t-p-u upload. This
sho
Hi,
2010/11/25 Russ Allbery :
> Ah, hm, that's a good point. I hadn't thought about that, since the old
> Shibboleth modules depended on Apache. But the current packages only
> recommend.
>
> I'm not sure the best way to do this. Check for whether apache2.2-common
> is installed, since it conta
[added debian-live as requested by Daniel]
Hi,
2010/11/13 Philipp Kern :
> Please wait until this is formally communicated. The name might as well
> still change. (Or the contents of the Release file, for pinning etc.)
>
> (I.e. the uncoordinated export from ftp-master wasn't our "wish".)
Of c
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:18:47 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>
>> Since the planned way to keep clamav updated in Squeeze will be by
>> updating to the latest current clamav stable release, the same should
>> naturally apply during
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2010-09-08 16:10 +0200, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> I think that this need is justification to declare backports "officially
>> supported by the debian project". Thus when asked this question, you
>> can point to the fact that chromium is ind
14 matches
Mail list logo
