m68k w-b and sid move

2008-09-23 Thread Stephen R Marenka
. We are still discussing the move of contrib to debian-ports. It requires mini-dak improvements I believe. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: possible mass bug filing: not satisfied build dependencies in testing

2008-08-21 Thread Stephen R Marenka
.11-2) build-indep-depends on gcc-3.4-m68k-linux-gnu {NOT > > AVAILABLE} > > Dito Neither one probably belongs in testing anyway as they are m68k-specific. I believe all the other m68k-specific packages have already been punted. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life'

Re: maxima build failure on m68k

2008-03-10 Thread Stephen R Marenka
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=maxima&arch=m68k&ver=5.13.0-3.1&stamp=1205105278&file=log&as=raw On it. m68k buildd issues should probably go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for best results. :) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you&

Re: sarge support for m68k

2007-12-24 Thread Stephen R Marenka
tephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: sarge support for m68k

2007-12-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
't know if I ever got it working. I'll check back on that and also on kullervo. At least that explains why I couldn't get to crest the other day. :) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: m68k and lenny

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:07:09AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:

Re: m68k and lenny

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > >

Re: m68k and lenny

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:43:53PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri Apr 13, 2007 at 07:41:55 -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we > > need to do to get back in and release with lenny?

m68k and lenny

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
It appears that m68k has been dropped from the testing suite. What do we need to do to get back in and release with lenny? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please unblock penguin_19-3

2007-02-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
to install m68k/mac. (This is due to an actual user request.) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: m68k release future

2006-10-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
-support base-type packages. I'd hate to have to maintain unstable/testing as the distribution on my buildd's. >(d) try to release with etch+1, possibly with coldfire support ack > The m68k certification pages on the wiki suggest it might be good to > have acks/naks from

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-10-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
because we haven't made a bunch of noise about it, doesn't mean we haven't been working. Dude, either help or go away. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: please build the mew-beta package for mips and m68k

2006-09-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
> > Could anyone remove the Dep-Wait status to build the mew-beta package? done for m68k. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-09-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
oo limited to care about m68k. I'd suggest you prepare > the m68k binary updates from the regular source updates available on > s.d.o on your own. Could m68k still do security building out of wanna-build? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-09-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 12:02:07AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:12:13AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I think we do need to have a discussion about ports that don't build the > > full archive, but otherwise can make a stable rele

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-09-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:43:54AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm not saying quantity isn't a problem or that politics isn't annoying, > > but the m68k port's biggest problem since gc

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

2006-09-19 Thread Stephen R Marenka
't know that anyone will ever try to run gnucash or gnuradio on it. I know there is interest in running X, web and mail servers, and irc clients. Anything less will make it hard to support the port and two years to another release is a long time. Okay, that's more than I intended to

Re: kernel packages to remove from 'testing'

2006-08-30 Thread Stephen R Marenka
e the change to drop 2.2/2.4 until after beta 3. I believe it was to make sure we didn't accidentally delay the release or something. In any case, the m68k dailies have already moved to 2.6. We've dropped the subarchs that don't work with 2.6 yet. -- Stephen R. Marenka

Re: Timeline for r3

2006-06-29 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 06:40:01PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > - m68k kernel udebs were originally built incorrectly; I understood this > has been corrected but new udebs are not yet available in gluck:~dannf Should still be at gluck:~smarenka/m68k-lkdi-take2 -- Stephen R. Marenka

Re: requeueing failed packages with gcc 4.1

2006-06-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
nothing wrong with the package. Periodically, we do rebuild old failed to see if they work with the new environment. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: summarizing arch status

2006-06-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
tead > of having to look at other graphs? I don't have commit access, but I have submitted patches to the p-a-s maintainers. James provided me with some feedback and I submitted them again. No point in anyone duplicating the effort. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life'

Re: BinNMU for ftgl-dev?

2006-03-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
8k. It just so happens that I just worked through this on m68k. I rebuilt ftgl-dev then rebuilt gnubg against that and it built fine. It looks to me like a binNMU of ftgl-dev on m68k and hppa followed by a requeue of gnubg should do the trick. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun,

Re: fluidsynth binNMU?

2006-02-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 05:11:06PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 10:34:59AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to > > its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks &g

fluidsynth binNMU?

2006-02-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I noticed that libfluidsynth1 is uninstallable in sid on m68k due to its dependency on libreadline4, which is no longer in sid. It looks like a binNMU of fluidsynth should fix this? Is that correct? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doin

Re: D-I - Minor buildd problems

2005-12-09 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I are in different time zones. (Actually the m68k-build folks cover a pretty wide range of time zones. :-) Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: beta status

2005-11-02 Thread Stephen R Marenka
don't know the currently > status of it (beyond what's documented at > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstallerM68kTodo) and whether m68k will be > included in the beta is uncertian. The m68k main-menu bug does not effect 20051026. I've gotten all the way to base-installer (curr

Re: ofx and png transition

2005-10-20 Thread Stephen R Marenka
next day it is added to the archive, and the next day it hits the > mirror, and the next day the next build in the sequence can start. We've been able to build out of incoming for quite some time, so once a package is accepted, we can use it. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not

Re: #317475 related bugs still valid?

2005-10-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
hem > or should we do manual builds on crest? Or is the bug known to not > be fixed at all? I've queued them up and I'll close the bugs as they get built or not as appropriate. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it r

Re: wanna-build only knows about older versions?

2005-07-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
and uploaded by the > buildd admin? The security team signs the logs directly and returns them back to the buildd, which uploads them. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please Consider atari-bootstrap for sarge

2005-01-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
veral m68k/atari machines not previously supported and fixes problems loading the ramdisk to TT/FastRAM. I'm the co-maintainer of the package. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mozilla-firebird on m68k

2003-11-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
of any sort. The previous build on q650 took 70 hours. apache2 also > was taken by a4000t and not logged. Might be some lag there, maybe the box > went down. Adam said he'd taken it to lock it. He thought mrvn was building it and wouter was handling uploads. -- Stephen R. Marenka