Hey,
Le 14/11/2020 à 00:07, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable.
Thanks, uploaded now!
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Hey there,
The new evolution 3.38 stack from experimental is ready to upload to
unstable. The transition has been completed in Ubuntu 20.10 which means
we have the needed fixes available to complete it in Debian as well, I'm
happy to help with uploads (NMU if needed)
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
ecent versions
so it's not likely that we change our default for the next LTS.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Debian as well
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
diff -Nru glibmm2.4-2.45.41/debian/changelog glibmm2.4-2.45.41/debian/changelog
--- glibmm2.4-2.45.41/debian/changelog 2015-07-27 21:39:43.0 +
+++ glibmm2.4-2.45.41/debian/changelog 2015-07-29 13:26:43.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,28 @@
+glibmm2.4
Debian as well
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
diff -Nru gflags-2.1.2/debian/changelog gflags-2.1.2/debian/changelog
--- gflags-2.1.2/debian/changelog 2015-05-06 16:58:12.0 +
+++ gflags-2.1.2/debian/changelog 2015-07-29 10:30:48.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+gflags (2.1.2-2ubuntu1
Debian as well
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
diff -Nru cppunit-1.13.2/debian/changelog cppunit-1.13.2/debian/changelog
--- cppunit-1.13.2/debian/changelog 2014-08-25 04:30:28.0 +
+++ cppunit-1.13.2/debian/changelog 2015-07-29 10:25:09.0 +
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+cppunit (1.13.2-2ubuntu1
to the previous question is yes, then would you like
> to assist us in this work ? (as we don't have gtk and general library
> packaging experience)
Sure, feel free to mail the debian-gtk-gnome list about any issue you
have on the topic
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
#x27;s really a non
trivial way, do you really need the new version for etch?
Sebastien Bacher
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Le mardi 16 mai 2006 à 10:23 +0200, Sven Luther a écrit :
> Ok, but if someone else would be packaging those to produce .udebs, you have
> no particular objection to uploading .debs to experimental at the same time ?
Are you saying you want to hijack GTK now?
Sebastien Bacher
.15 anyway
I'm not interested to upload a GTK 2.9 variant building only the .udebs
to unstable neither
Sebastien Bacher
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a lot of changes and new features for 2.10 and "a
random 2.9 snapshot" is not something we are wanting to ship with a
stable Debian
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've just uploaded gnome-system-monitor 2.8.1-2. The previous version of
the package includes some scrollkeeper generated files and should not,
this package fixes the issue.
The interdiff is attached to this mail if you want to consider the
change for sarge.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
can't juge gnome2.6 on a separate mistake. BTW I still
belive that's not a mistake since gconf-editor is an esay way to
configure it ... and the configuration problem is a gstreamer0.8 problem
and not a rhythmbox one!
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
ated to
gnome2.6 here. Rhythmbox 0.8 has been built in i386 only before
uploading, it's a gtk+2.2 related package (gtk2.4 is not in unstable
yet), it closes ~ 15 bugs and it's nothing related to gnome desktop
(look on gnome.org or gnome lists if you're not convinced).
Thanks,
Sebastien Bacher
ted discussion out of -release please.
Thanks,
Sebastien Bacher
t ...) but not a candidate for unstable (since it's a 2.3 devel
branch) and not a part of gnome2.6.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Le sam, 22/05/2004 à 18:09 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 01:01:01PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > The m68k build is in progress (gtk+2.0 and a part of gnome2.6 have been
> > built).
>
> Unfortunately, "in progress" doesn't mea
BTW I don't have time to do this, but if somebody want to test this it
would be nice!
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
2.6
before the upload to unstable or are we ok now ?
Sebastien Bacher,
for the GNOME Team
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And what is with external (non-GNOME) stuff depending on gtk/atk/etc.?
> It would be held up then regardless of whether they fix important or even
> RC bugs...
Hi,
Don't worry we are not going in this way.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
#x27;s not possible
to keep this effort continualy, that's wasting too much ressource for no
gain ...
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
ww.marcbrockschmidt.de/tmp/debian/GNOME2.6-list
Thanks,
Sebastien Bacher
m doesn't want breakage.
The Gnome Team neither.
> Thus, GNOME 2.6 needs to be in the same state GNOME 2.4 is currently
> in before it can replace GNOME 2.4.
We are not speaking about uploading in sarge directly ...
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
thout any problem, that's much than 95% of the
unstable packages ...
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
BTW any chance to speed up new libcupsys2 acceptation in experimental ?
The name has changed and it's in NEW ... having it accepted now would be
great since we are waiting on it for the last changes.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
PS: could you keep the reply on -gtk-gnome list. I've not subscribed to
-release, and that's the case for most of gnome maintainers I think.
.
We also have a lot of active people working on these packages (the Gnome
Team has 28 members), many users ready to test and help and usually
problems are reported and fixed pretty fast.
So what the release team thinks about this ? If you are fine with that
we can start the migration today.
Sebastien Bacher,
for the GNOME Team
ycle if GNOME 2.6 didn't make the cut?
Yes, network shares browsing in nautilus (especially smb://) is totally
broken with GNOME2.4 , which is really a problem for people using it in
a network with Windows' boxes.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
GNOME 2.4 out of unstable.
> If nothing happens after a few days, feel free to prepare a galeon NMU for
> testing (I don't have time at the moment, sorry).
What about letting NMUgaleon 1.2.5 in testing today and working on
mozilla after that ? It'll help a lot the GNOME situation ...
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * python-gnome2: s390
Due to #212854 on gnome-vfs2 ... I'll probably NMU gnome-vfs2 soon if
Takuo KITAME doesn't fix it.
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
29 matches
Mail list logo
