Le lun, 17/05/2004 à 18:39 -0400, Joe Drew a écrit : > It seems pretty simple to me. You're saying it's in a state such that it > can replace gnome 2.4, which has already gone from unstable to testing. > There is, however, no proof of that, and thus there's risk of something > breaking.
Please read the end of my mail. I'm saying that we don't need to fix gnome2.4 packages (they have not changed for weeks/months), so we can put gnome2.6 in unstable, lock it by filling RC bugs on glib/gtk and see if all go as fine as expected. > The release team doesn't want breakage. The Gnome Team neither. > Thus, GNOME 2.6 needs to be in the same state GNOME 2.4 is currently > in before it can replace GNOME 2.4. We are not speaking about uploading in sarge directly ... Cheers, Sebastien Bacher
