Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?

Hi, On 06/16/2011 09:57 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:31 +0200, Rik Theys wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:39 +0200, Rik Theys wrote: The debdiff output is in attach. Overall the diff looks fine, but I noticed that a

Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?

Hi, On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 13:39 +0200, Rik Theys wrote: Please could you provide a debdiff against the current package? i.e. the output of "debdiff $stable.dsc yours.dsc". The debdiff output is in attach. Thanks. Overall the diff looks

Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?

angelog mod-gnutls-0.5.6/debian/changelog --- mod-gnutls-0.5.6/debian/changelog 2010-03-26 07:33:39.0 +0100 +++ mod-gnutls-0.5.6/debian/changelog 2011-06-10 08:30:26.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +mod-gnutls (0.5.6-1squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * Apply upstream patch for upstre

Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?

Hi, On 06/09/2011 10:40 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: A few things: - the fix should probably get a bit more exposure in unstable before we accept it in stable Testing and unstable already have a more recent version now, but the fixed package has been running here for a few months now without any

Re: Would you cosider accepting this update to address bug 615227 in squeeze?

Hi, On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:57:41 -0800, Jack Bates wrote: Hi, to address bug 615227 in squeeze, would you consider accepting an updated package with just these changes? http://nottheoilrig.com/debian/201103110/patch - or do you have any other f

Unblocks for security fixes

Hi, When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some of the security bugs are fixed in unstable. aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1 bind9: CVE-2010-3762, fixed in 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1 cups: CVE-2010-2941, fixed in 1.4.4-7 freeradius: CVE-2010-3696 and CVE-2010-3697, fi

Re: Is it possible to get a fix for libc6 and nfs-kernel-server intoetch r1?

.5-7. > Then everything is ok for us, I will work on the upload during the > week-end. Great! Thanks! So the package should show up in http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian/dists/etch-proposed-updates/main/... ? I also think this leak is in sarge's libc6 but I don't know if point releases for

Is it possible to get a fix for libc6 and nfs-kernel-server into etch r1?

ly by running the example program mentioned in the bugzilla bug report. The nfs-kernel-server also leaks memory in two functions. The fix is a one line fix in both cases. The fixes have also been applied to the version in testing (1.0.12) and unstable. Thanks Rik -- Rik Theys KU Leuven - Dept.

Re: Mozilla codebase releases 1.8.1.2 and 1.8.0.10

't seem to have a QA team). Greetings, Rik -- Rik Theys <> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]