Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>rtheys a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> From my point of view the patch looks correct as it has been applied
>>> upstream and is now in unstable. However, it looks like nobody has
>>> really tried the glibc with this patch applied to make sure it fixes
>>> *this* bug.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I did rebuild the etch glibc package with the patch applied and I can
>> confirm that it fixes this (leak in innetgr) bug. You can find the
>fixed
>> libc6 packages at:
>>
>> http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~rtheys/glibc
>>
>> Or did you mean "no debian developer" with 'nobody'?
>>
> Oops sorry, it looks like have read the bug log too quickly, and I
> have been troubled that the bug has been marked as found in version
> 2.5-7.
> Then everything is ok for us, I will work on the upload during the
> week-end.
Great! Thanks!
So the package should show up in
http://ftp.be.debian.org/debian/dists/etch-proposed-updates/main/... ?
I also think this leak is in sarge's libc6 but I don't know if point
releases for sarge are still planned?
PS: I don't seem to be getting your emails (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
:-(. Are you getting bounces from my e-mail address?
--
Rik Theys
KU Leuven - Dept. ESAT
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10
B-3001 LEUVEN - HEVERLEE
Tel.: +32(0)16/32.11.07
----------------------------------------------------------------
<<Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors>>
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
