es freerdp FTBFS due to
> newly added symbols.
>
> What do you suggest? Lowering -c4 to -c3 to ignore the symbols change?
> Adjusting the patch to flag the recently added functions as static?
I think changing the patch is the way to go.
--
Otavio Salvador
we are glad to participate
> :)
After a1:
check new and current bugs that has known fixes or are easy to fix
work on those
start preparing a2 / b1
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7
I'm sad to ask for it but I won't be able to take it by myself and do
need your help.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador
ota...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 13:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 14:51 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer.
>
> That was nearly two weeks ago now; what's the current status?
Mostly OK; I need
I'm traveling but today tonight I'll upload the built installer.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
Em 26/03/2012 13:57, "
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:49, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Waiting the kernel
>>
> No you're not, the kernel is the same in wheezy and sid.
I didn't see it migrated. I am uploading installer as other packages
waiting here (nbd and win32-loader) are not in ini
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 09:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I'd like to propose following timeline for alpha1 of installer:
>>
>> * until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
>>
can migrate until that's fixed.
Ok.
>> win32-loader
>
> Not done yet, pending confirmation from ftp-master that it's okay to do
> so before the corresponding files in /tools/ have been updated.
Ok.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. System
Hi Release Team,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> * on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing
Please age the following packages:
arcboot-installer
brltty
cdebconf
cdrom-detect
cdrom-retriever
colo-installer
debootstrap
elilo-installer
finish-install
fl
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 18:07, Didier Raboud wrote:
> Would it be possible to have win32-loader migrated as part of d-i on 03/17
> too?
I'll ask for it with the other packages.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.c
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:20, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
>> needed later as well.
>>
> It's fixed already.
I'll do transl
o imply a new kernel upload to fix the mips* ext3-modules
> issue? (r18812 in kernel SVN)
Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
needed later as well.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http:/
n the item above) we do
the upload of installer
If it all does well, we could have it done in two weeks ... I'd like
to know if someone has any objection with the above otherwise I plan
to start following it.
Comments?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E
s can set the suite according too.
>
> Has this been discussed with the buildd folks yet, given they'd need to
> be the ones adding all the flag files?
Only at Debconf; after that no. We ought to discuss this with them too.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
. When
stable comes, buildds can set the suite according too.
Comments?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From
0.9.8)
It seems that fixing the RC bug, in the isdnutils case, was the
missing thing and now seems OK. So now it turns into the normal
transition window as this blocker has been fixed.
Have I missed anything?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossys
27;s list.
>
> If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> that the partman-* changes won't be included? Might it not make more
> sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6
0
> and libipx.so.2 being in /lib, please let us know. These libraries
> are needed in /lib because zfs and zpool are linked with them, see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636668#55 for the bug
> report.
No problem from our POV.
--
Otavio Salvador
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote:
> can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be
> built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM
> bugs.
Yes; those can be removed.
Thanks by handling it.
--
Otavio
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 22:12, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
>> Mostly; the only addition situation we'll need to rebuild the
>> installer is when the amount of translation changes for a specific
>> language so we get the
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:54, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Looks sane from a quick look. Can we also see the code that generates
> this, maybe?
I sent the two patches I have queued to push to mailing list; please
comment on them.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 17:05, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
>>> information in the Built-Using
or a specific
language so we get the 'translation-status' file updated into the
initrd.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 16:36, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 07/30/2011 06:23 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Basically it gather all udebs included on the initrd and puts this
>> information in the Built-Using field of the binary package.
>>
>> Comments, welcome :-)
>
>
stores a similar file into
dists//main/Translation-Status-udeb.txt with the proper values
With it, the installer, during the build can download it and keep it
updated regarding the translation status of every language
automatically.
Comments, welcome ;-)
--
Otavio Salvador
Hello,
I am considering to use unstable for next upload and for it I did a
try to get suite mostly (more details regarding translation-status
later) done.
Comments, welcome...
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http
, welcome :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
control
Description: Binary data
m to be:
...
> 4. Profit and get rid of d-i releases and just handle d-i like any
> other package.
Let's get rid of Otavio ;-) ...
Well, this is my goal too so it will be much eaiser to deal with d-i
and to have more people joining the development if it is made easier.
Let's wo
at the end
this is going to make the installer release process easier to
understand and handle.
Please share your ideas regarding those proposed changes so we can
start looking on the required changes to accomplish all this.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
--
Otavio Salvador
ota...@debian.or
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:17, Mark Hymers wrote:
>> I fully agree with Christian; we just need to have the current release
>> on sid and we really don't need to have the old ones.
>
> Ok, done.
Thanks by handling it.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador
rent release
on sid and we really don't need to have the old ones.
...
> otavio mentioned a small VAC so his answer might be delayed.
I am mostly recovered and handling the backlog I had during my VAC and
recovering process. Please apologise my delay in replying to this
thread.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 18:09, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> It looks like this got uploaded, but targeted at unstable where there's
> already a newer version, so it got rejected:
Yes. I did it wrong :-( My fault.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
4th or 25th.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 18:19, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:23:42AM +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
>> assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
>>
is for that?
...
It depends on the ETA for 6.0.1. I'd a week before the targeted date
assuming it builds fine on all arches. For a confort level, I'd say a
cuple of weeks like a good time for we to update the installer for it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 18:10, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2011-02-12 22:46]:
>> I have prepare some branches that has what I am intending to upload to
>> stable-proposed-updates. The modules I have changed are the following:
>
> There are two more updat
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 22:15, Jurij Smakov wrote:
...
> Ping, any opinions on this?
...
>From my POV it seems fine. RM people?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
No objection from our side.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 20:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
...
> Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00286.html
...
It is OK for us.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br
onfusingly similar names --
> And, since this thread demonstrates that we don't have an agreed on
> human-understandable name for it --
> Perhaps we should determine what the suite will finally be called in
> wheezy, and use that name in d-i?
+1
--
Otavio Salvador
nt bug fixes', or something to that effect?
They're not only bug fixes but also database updates and like.
Important system updates?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 22:46:07 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
> Is there any chance we can update the apt-setup debconf templates to
> stop talking about volatile?
I guess so. It is more a translation issue then a tech
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 20:45, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I've created a squeeze branch for console-setup branched from the
> version in squeeze with only the change to fix #610843 and pushed this
> branch to the d-i repo.
Thanks by doing that.
Cheers,
--
O
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 19:49, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> My fault. Please take a look.
>
> Just the debconf title fix so far? That looks fine; thanks.
Up to now, yes.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossy
> If you want I can prepare a branch and upload the fix.
>>
> It needs to be fixed and tested in sid first.
This is right. Samuel, can you upload console-setup (to sid) plz?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.os
h so near of 6.0.1 we do all the uploads.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debia
her *unexpectedly*. Having to save space by
> deleting the release notes and on the other hand installing two scanning
> applications is somehow hard to make clear to people...
The problem here is that the CD layout will change completely and can
bring or remove packages due this change.
--
ll need to rebuild it later on to pick up any further
> builds of lkdi-* or other udebs.
cdebconf and debootstrap can go soon. installer itself neeeds lkdi.
kernel-wedge I will wait a bit more to see if nothing important shows
up to avoid doing another upload in a roll.
--
Otavio Salva
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:52, Joey Hess wrote:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> grub-installer
>
> I don't see a squeeze branch, but assuming it's fixing the debconf title
> bug, all for it.
humm. My bad. I am uploading the branch right now.
>> tasksel
>
>
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 23:13, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:46:07PM +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
...
>> linux-kernel-di-sparc-2.6
>
> This should probably be uploaded once the update kernel for 6.0.1 is
> available?
Yes. But all kernel udebs will be upload
anything is
missing please say so.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Squeeze to happen. On 3rd of Feb I
ought to be back and regularly online again.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
t; I'm ok to approve this upload but I prefer to have an ack from Otavio (or
> boot folks) first.
Please accept it however in the yaboot case I would prefer to try to
get a newer version into squeeze after this fix has been done. So in
my opinion we ought:
- accept the t-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
Please unblock and age following packages:
user-setup
hw-detect
os-prober
Thanks in advance,
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/
gt; zfsutils
> ttf-sinhala-lklug
Those are auto.
>> kfreebsd-kernel-di-amd64
>> kfreebsd-kernel-di-i386
Needs ack.
However at this time, please do not unblock d-i affecting packages
without coordinating with us.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mai
ue" since not used in Debian yet.
>
>> Happy hacking,
>
> --
> Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
> http://dogguy.org/
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
aboot has not received
updating since long time and it was know broken for many situation.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
.c: /* Allocates shadow
> memory, and allocating a new space for Rotatation.
I fixed it in master.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBS
repare the package and let me know so I can sponsor it for you.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ.
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> As far as I know, updating the udebs here will be safe, as there are no
>> API or ABI changes. CCing -boot for confirmation.
>>
> Looks good to me, pending ack from Otavio.
Ack.
--
Otavio Salvador
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> s390-tools is preventing linux-2.6 from moving to testing. Otavio, is
> it ok to unblock it?
It is safe.. unblock it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.
bug it references, and I still don't understand.
> Maybe it's just how the geode palette works, but I'd like a clearer
> explanation. :)
Is it a requirement for the unblock? I am not involved on this change
so I don't know all the background of it.
--
Otavio Sal
Hello,
I am adding Martin-Eric to CC so he can address those issues.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:51:39 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Please unblock it since it fixes many critical issues for users.
>>
> -Provides: ${x
Hello
This release fixes VirtualBox RDP connection issues and other bugs,
please unblock.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hello
Please unblock it since it fixes many critical issues for users.
TIA,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:28 AM, Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> partman-md fixes an RC bug (#591917). Would it be ok to unblock it?
Ack (just did it on IRC)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
"Adam D. Barratt" writes:
> busybox recently migrated to testing; this new version apparently has an
> incompatibility with the netcfg version currently in testing, so we were
> asked by Aurelien whether it would be possible to migrate netcfg as
>
like the udeb lacks the Provides/Replaces
for the udeb and that will cause a breakage in kfreebsd-*. I've queued
up a patch to fix it in netcfg to push as soon as the upload it done
for sid.
Andrew, can you ping me when doing it? (from D-I POV it can be done).
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador
udhcpc/udhcpc packages in squeeze (there were in lenny).
>>
>> [I'm subscribed to -release, no need to CC]
>
>
> By reading the changelog, there are changes that could affect D-I, but
> I don't think they might break it:
>
> [ Otavio Salvador ]
> * [u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello RM team,
We'll need another debian-installer build since powerpc is broken; then
we can use this opportunity to fix those issues as well.
Here goes a set of hints related to d-i:
unblock bogl/0.1.18-3.1
unblock choose-mirror/2.32 # please ag
for GCC maintainers
since it will migrate automatically when it is ready (normal rules for
testing) so I see no point in making it harder using an extra source.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 998
wever I talked to RM and it is not possible to accept
it in testing without it having been built for kFreeBSD so please
upload it with the patch you mention and bump the priority of it to
get it built and ready for testing soon.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota
ough this will
> change the kernel ABI.
Please do; this allow us to get rid of the PAT bug :-)
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Yes, you got the picture right.
I offer help if required.
Cheers,
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Gran writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Can hdparm please be unblocked? It is on permanent block since it
> produces a udeb, even though the udeb is not used by d-i, or within
> Debian.
Ack; it can be added to the auto list.
>
> Cheers,
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft writes:
> Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable.
Ack
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux Us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 09:33:02AM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
>>please unblock libtextwrap 0.1-8 pciutils 1:3.1.3-1 (both with udebs)
>>
>>Changes:
>>
>> libtextwrap (0.1-8) unstable; urgency=low
>> .
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jurij Smakov writes:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 06:40:19PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> fontconfig has been waiting 21 days for migration, perhaps it should be
>> unblocked? No RC bugs were filed during that time.
>
> debian-boot, please
Hello Luk,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Luk Claes wrote:
> If it's binNMU safe, we could try a binNMU, otherwise it's best to
> either do a porter NMU if possible or a sourceful upload otherwise.
Yeah, binNMU ought to work fine. Please go ahead with that.
--
-06-16 10:42
> initrd-i386/usr/share/keyrings/archive.gpg
>
> You can see that the i386 archive.gpg file is clearly larger.
[...]
This is indeed a problem; probably the package were not up to date on
the used mirror :(
RM team,
Is there a way to update the installer in case?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> please allow debian-edu-install 0.675 into testing, which is blocked from
> migrating due to it's udebs. i do not believe the udebs are used in a default
> install, and thus shouldn't impact debian-installer.
No objection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> please unblock libpng 1.2.37-1 pciutils 1:3.1.2-5 (both with udebs)
>
> Changes:
> libpng (1.2.37-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release
>
> Changes:
> pciutils (1:3.1.2-5) unstable; urgency=med
to fix it ourselves, which would
> mean branching d-i and a whole lot of more work (for the years to come).
I have no problem in prepare that fix for it however it needs a full
d-i update to happen. If RM team is OK with it I can take a look at it
and prepare the packages during this week.
--
Otav
or a while, given the
> expected amount of updates.
ATM they're really relaxed; more to the end of mounth they should
be more restrict again since we'll probably be working at alpha1
images.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adeodato Simó writes:
> Hello,
>
> I ve just pushed the directfb transition to testing, and I m looking
> into pushing the needed udeb packages as well (libcairo-directfb2-udeb,
> libgtk-directfb-2.0-0-udeb, etc.)
>
> Most of these belong to regular
Luk Claes writes:
> Neil Williams wrote:
>> Could emdebian-tools be unblocked please so that 1.6.0 can migrate into
>> testing in a few days time?
>
> unblocked
>
>> (Is there a different way to do this - iirc it is only because of the
>> udeb which is not incorporated into d-i directly at this t
OK to apply?
I see no problem on the attached patches and I belive them are low
risk enough for us to add them. minix-modules is available so I see
no problem et all.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit :
>> Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or
>> less up-to-date status of the preparations.
>
> The installer team requested that gtk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes writes:
> Michael Schutte wrote:
>> Hi -release,
>>
>> Please let kbd 1.15-1 (which builds kbd-udeb) migrate to testing.
>
> Cc-ing d-i list to see if it's ok to unblock it now.
[...]
Ack
- --
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
- -
Adeodato Simó writes:
> * Otavio Salvador [Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:10:34 -0300]:
>
>> Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
>> RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider
>> suitable for moving into release.debian.org.
>
> I'll note that our goal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
RM people has get in touch with me asking for which script we consider
suitable for moving into release.debian.org.
The only ones that come to my head are:
1. testing summary (http://merkel.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/testing-summary.html)
2. bui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:33 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
>
>> please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2
>>
>> PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release?
>
> They are always blocked (before, after and during the
Luk Claes writes:
> Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Josselin Mouette writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
>>> they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
>>&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Hi,
>
> glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since
> they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock
> them?
Ack; since major issues has been solve I belive we're ok to g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> please approve / unblock pciutils/1:3.0.3-2 (udeb)
>
> Changes:
> pciutils (1:3.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Upload to unstable
>* Put back Matthew Wilcox in uploaders
>* Update pci.ids with sna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> please approve / unblock xfsprogs/2.10.2-2 (udeb)
>
> Closes: 514072
> Changes:
> xfsprogs (2.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Remove --enable-lib64=yes in Makefile (closes: #514072)
Ack.
- --
O
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> please approve / unblock libpng/1.2.35-1
>
> Closes: 486415 516256
> Changes:
> libpng (1.2.35-1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* New upstream release
> - http://secunia.com/advisories/33970/
>Fix a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:58:59AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could you please allow libsdl1.2/1.2.13-4 to migrate into testing, if it
>> is ok from a d-i PoV? It has no RC bug and is waiting for more than 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems writes:
> newer upstream version fixes fstype ext4 recognotion,
> plus minor bunch of stuff.
No objection
> on a side note this version still saw a patch by ths applied.
> missing him!?!
:(
- --
O T A V I OS A L V
Luis Matos writes:
> Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
>> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
>>
1 - 100 of 564 matches
Mail list logo
