Luis Matos <g...@otiliamatos.ath.cx> writes:
> Dom, 2009-02-15 às 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank escreveu:
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 09:13:33PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> > Unless you can find someone who is committed to make GTK+ work on the
>> > DirectFB backend, I strongly recommend that the installer considers
>> > using X11 instead.
>>
>> Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition
>> - the X server,
>> - evdev input module and
>> - a framebuffer video module.
>>
> humm ... i am just a dumb debian user, but, besides the size, the gtk
> direct framebuffer implementation was made also because of performance
> issues related with having the Xserver loaded, right? (not only because
> disk space)
I fear that if no one step ahead to maintain the directfb backend we'll
end without any other option.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: ota...@debian.org UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
