On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 08:03:55PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Took me a bit to sort out my confusion on this (since there is no real
> libuim1 package anywhere in the archive and libuim3 is already in testing),
> but these are scheduled now, thanks.
I was wondering how uim went into testing
Dear release managers,
I requested binNMU for scim-uim a few weeks ago, and it went well.
However it turns out to need another binNMU to adapt to the libuim1 to
libuim3 transition.
I am pretty sure scim-uim doesn't used the changed API (if any) in this
transition, and I've tested a rebuild locall
Dear release managers,
Starting from version 1:1.1.1, package uim changed the SONAME, and
builds libuim1 instead of libuim0. As scim-uim depends on libuim0, it
is uninstallable in unstable now (bug #382444).
This library transition for uim indeed has API changes, but fortunately
scim-uim doesn't
Hello libxft maintainers and release managers,
I've been following the development of font related library packages in
Debian, as some of the new features in the recent upstream releases are
important for rendering CJK fonts. So I'm quite happy to see xft
2.1.8.2 entered unstable a few days ago.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 03:06:07PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> It has a very troublesome RC bug (#147187) which appears to have had
> no progress in over three years. It doesn't look straightforward to track
> down or solve, either.
>
> Revdeps in testing:
>
> * gibraltar-bootsupport from g
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:05:01AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 04:36:15PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote:
> > Can someone please review http://bugs.debian.org/343060 and tell me what
> > to do about it? Several people are claiming libaspell needs to be
> > rebuilt, and in that c
Hello release managers,
scim had an SONAME change after sarge release, and was involved in both
of the libstdc++ transitions, but now it seems the affected packages are
finally ready to enter testing.
I believe the following packages need to go into testing together to
avoid uninstallable issues:
I have a question:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 07:17:17PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> * Rename and Rebuild the libraries listed below. The new suffix for
>these packages should be in any case "c2a" (instead of "c2"). No
>new suffix is needed when the soname changes in a new upstream
>u
> main app scim-anthy
> main app scim-canna
> main app scim-chewing
> main app scim-hangul
> main app scim-pinyin
> main app scim-prime
> main app scim-skk
> main app scim-uim
Please check scim-tables, which depends on libscim8 and just went out of
NEW queue today. It probably needs a sourceful u
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:51:35PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> This is just a rundown of what little is left, and why.
May I add scim into this list (scim in stable should build libscim0, but
didn't; scim in unstable fixed this and builds libscim8)?
scim is currently blocked by scim-tables a
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:37:19PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Filing a bug can't hurt but I don't think we would remove them from
> > testing immediatly just for that.
>
> One could also elevate the severity #323831, but I'd prefer that a
> working set of scim packages stayed in testing (as is
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 02:19:51PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > * Updating scim makes 3 non-depending packages uninstallable on alpha:
> > scim-hangul, scim-m17n, scim-uim
> > * scim-hangul has the latest version in testing (0.1.2-1)
> > * scim-m17n has the latest version in testing (0.1.3
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:29:55PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> > So from my understanding, it's urgent for libfreetype6 to bump its
> > shlibs from "libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1)" to "libfreetype6 (>=
> > 2.1.10-1)".
>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at
Package: libfreetype6
Version: 2.1.10-1
Severity: important
Hi Will,
I am filing this bug to raise your attention about the API changes in
libfreetype6 from 2.1.7 to 2.1.10. Due to the large extent it may
affect, I am also cc:ing debian-release.
FreeType 2.1.7 was released on November 2003, and
(Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
Dear release managers,
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:35:25PM -0500, minghua wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > The changes look generally acceptable but you should hurry with finding
> > a sponsor.
(Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:09:43PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> The changes look generally acceptable but you should hurry with finding
> a sponsor...
Mike Hommey sponsored this upload (Thanks Mike!). It's built on all
arches now. W
Hi Steve,
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 06:37:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 08:31:56PM -0500, Ming Hua wrote:
> > (Please cc: me as I am not subscribed to debian-release.)
>
> > I've also prepared a scim-chinese 0.4.2-3 package
as Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to fix FTBFS with
gcc-4.0.
(Closes: #297975)
-- Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 16 May 2005 20:58:21 -0500
Thanks for consideration,
Ming
2005.05.17
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to smooth future upgrades. [minghua]
-- Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 16 May 2005 21:11:00 -0500
Thanks for consideration,
Ming
2005.05.17
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tter than setting Conflicts:.
- Move Chinese TrueType font packages from Depends: to Recommends:.
* debian/README.Debian: New. Basic information about scim-chinese and tips
about ``pinyin with tone''. [minghua]
-- Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:20:50 -0600
P
20 matches
Mail list logo
